Page 42 - JCTR-10-3
P. 42

216                       Rando et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(3): 212-218
        alterations reported in humans with FTR, wherein the normally   a  rigid  model with fixed  geometry even  after the application
        saddle-shaped  tricuspid  annulus dilates  and  becomes  more   of surgical repairs. Perhaps the most comparable  model was
        circular [14-17]. We also observed alterations in the subvalvular   proposed by Maisano  et al., wherein a closed, pressurized
        apparatus of the tricuspid valve, with significant increases in the   circuit was developed using a centrifugal pump, and the porcine
        anterior leaflet angle, tenting height, tenting area, and tenting   right  ventricle  was  dilated  with  sustained  pressure  [23]. The
        volume. Historically, the importance of the subvalvular anatomy   authors used radiopaque markers and fluoroscopy to document
        of the tricuspid valve was not appreciated, and the emphasis   the occurrence of tricuspid annular dilation, papillary muscle
        was placed  primarily  on  reducing  the  size  of  the  tricuspid   displacement, and induction of FTR after pressurizing the right
        annulus to restore leaflet coaptation. Recent publications have   ventricle. Our model requires fewer resources; the pneumatic
        emphasized  the  importance  of  residual  leaflet  tethering  as  a   pump and 3D light scanner required for this model are both
        predictor of failure after tricuspid repair and have called  for   commercially  available  and comparatively  inexpensive.
        novel  repair  strategies  that  address  both  annular  dilation  and   Furthermore,  the  3D geometry  of our  model  was directly
        leaflet tethering [18-20]. Our ex vivo model of FTR incorporates   compared to normal and diseased human TTE data in this study,
        both of these geometric alterations and thus offers a realistic   whereas the model suggested by Maisano et al. solely describes
        platform for testing novel repair strategies.          the geometric changes relative to the baseline.
          When directly comparing geometric measurements between   We  acknowledge  that  this  model  has several  limitations.
        the ex vivo model and human TTE data, the majority of annular   First, this is a static representation of the tricuspid valve at peak
        dimensions remained similar. These results are consistent with   systole and  cannot  be used to evaluate  valvular  anatomy  in
        both ex vivo and in vivo reports of porcine tricuspid anatomy. In   diastole. We believe that the mid-systolic phase of the cardiac
        an evaluation of 119 porcine hearts, Waziri et al. demonstrated   cycle is the most clinically relevant to capture when evaluating
        no  difference  in  tricuspid  annulus  circumference  or  area   the effectiveness of repair strategies for FTR. Tricuspid stenosis
        compared  to  humans  [21]. Similarly, Fawzy  et al. evaluated   is exceedingly uncommon and is unlikely  to occur with the
        the 3D geometry of the tricuspid annulus in anesthetized swine   application of repair strategies for FTR, where the annulus has
        using sonomicrometry and described similar annular dimensions   already dilated from baseline. Even so, the diastolic performance
        to humans [22]. These findings collectively demonstrate that the   of novel repairs would need to be examined  in vivo or with
        native porcine tricuspid valve reasonably approximates that of a   a dynamic,  pulsatile  ex  vivo model.  Second, preservation  of
        human, justifying its future utilization in translational research.  the pericardium was not possible due to the manner in which
          Our data demonstrated that the subvalvular apparatus of the   the  porcine  hearts  were  harvested. Assessment of  pericardial
        porcine tricuspid valve was not directly comparable to that of a   contributions  to valvular  geometry  would be better  assessed
        human. At baseline, the porcine tricuspid valve had a narrower   with an in vivo model. Furthermore, we employed a pneumatic
        minor axis with steeper leaflet angles and greater tenting than   model for pressurizing the right ventricle, potentially resulting
        that of a human. As such, many of these differences persisted   in different mechanics of valve closure than those observed with
        after inducing FTR; the porcine valve had greater anterior and   blood. The pneumatic  model  also limits  our ability  to assess
        septal leaflet angles, tenting height, and tenting volume relative   the right ventricle, as the structured light scanner used in this
        to human  TTE data. Given that our annular measurements   model is restricted to the assessment of surface-level anatomy.
        were comparable between the ex vivo model and human TTE   Qualitative assessment of the right ventricle in the ex vivo model
        data,  the  observed  differences  in  subvalvular  measurements   before and after sustained pneumatic  pressurization  suggests
        likely  reflect  differences  in  anatomy  between  species  rather   right  ventricular dilatation  as the  source  of increased  tenting
        than flaws in the ex vivo model itself. Surprisingly, no study   angles with the induction of FTR, but this was not quantifiable.
        has evaluated the differences in subvalvular anatomy between   Similarly, the individual contribution of constituent elements of
        swine and humans, despite numerous translational studies being   the tricuspid valve was not assessed in this research. Previous
        performed  in  porcine  models.  Despite  these  differences,  the   research has implicated  the transition between the papillary
        strength of this model lies in the geometric alterations observed   muscle  and chordae  tendinae  as a potential  origin  of valve
        between the native and FTR states; although the subvalvular   deformation  [24,25], which may or may not be accurately
        measurements were not identical between swine and humans,   represented by the ex vivo model proposed herein. Finally, as
        the  directional  and incremental changes  between  normal  and   mentioned above, it is important to take into consideration the
        diseased specimens were similar.                       baseline  differences  in  anatomy  between  swine  and  humans
          Furthermore,  our  model  compares  favorably  to  those   when interpreting results from this model. We observed modest
        described by other groups in terms of validity, simplicity, and   differences in subvalvular anatomy between swine and human
        cost. Adkins  et al. induced FTR in ovine hearts by injecting   data. As such, any subvalvular geometric measurements sampled
        95% phenol around the annulus to create  annular  dilation,   in the ex vivo FTR model should be interpreted in reference to
        but the degree of dilation was not validated and there was no   ex vivo native measurements, and not to normal human TTE data.
        alteration of the subvalvular apparatus [3]. Stock et al. isolated   5. Conclusion
        porcine tricuspid valve complexes and mounted them on an
        adjustable supporting device [4]. This allowed for replication   The  ex vivo  porcine model of FTR characterized in this
        of  the  geometric  changes  observed  with  FTR but  provided   study  demonstrates  consistent  annular  dilation  and  leaflet

                                              DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.24.00003
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47