Page 73 - JCTR-9-4
P. 73

Al-Qahtani et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2023; 9(4): 282-289   289
        Table S1. (Continued)
        Major components                                        Response options
         The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Methodology Checklist for Cross‑Sectional/Prevalence Study Website: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
                                                       gov/books/NBK35156/
        1. Define the source of information (survey, record review)  Yes        No                 Unclear
        2.  List inclusion and exclusion criteria for exposed and unexposed   Yes  No              Unclear
          subjects (cases and controls) or refer to previous publications
        3. Indicate time period used for identifying patients   Yes             No                 Unclear
        4. Indicate whether or not subjects were consecutive if not population‑based  Yes  No      Unclear
        5.  Indicate if evaluators of subjective components of study were masked to   Yes  No      Unclear
          other aspects of the status of the participants
        6.  Describe any assessments undertaken for quality assurance   Yes     No                 Unclear
          purposes (e.g., test/retest of primary outcome measurements) Not
          applicable
        7. Explain any patient exclusions from analysis         Yes             No                 Unclear
        8. Describe how confounding was assessed and/or controlled Not applicable  Yes  No         Unclear
        9.  If applicable, explain how missing data were handled in the analysis Not   Yes  No     Unclear
          applicable
        10.  Summarize patient response rates and completeness of data collection   Yes  No        Unclear
           Not applicable
        11.  Clarify what follow‑up, if any, was expected and the percentage of   Yes  No          Unclear
           patients for which incomplete data or follow‑up was obtained Not
           applicable
                                                         Crombie’s items
        1. Appropriateness of design to meet the aims           Yes (1 point)   Unclear (0.5 point)  No (0 point)
        2. Adequate description of the data                     Yes (1 point)   Unclear (0.5 point)  No (0 point)
        3. Report the response rates: not applicable            Yes (1 point)   Unclear (0.5 point)  No (0 point)
        4. Adequate representativeness of the sample to total   Yes (1 point)   Unclear (0.5 point)  No (0 point)
        5. Clearly stated aims and likelihood of reliable and valid measurements  Yes (1 point)  Unclear (0.5 point)  No (0 point)
        6. Assessment of statistical significance               Yes (1 point)   Unclear (0.5 point)  No (0 point)
        7. Adequate description of statistical methods          Yes (1 point)   Unclear (0.5 point)  No (0 point)





































                                          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202304.22-00189
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78