Page 108 - MI-2-3
P. 108

Microbes & Immunity                                                SARS-CoV-2 complementary classification



            present mutation rates, unforeseen selective pressures may   Acknowledgments
            alter these trajectories. Second, although SARS-CoV-2 has
            exhibited limited divergence to date, the potential for future   None.
            recombination or adaptive mutations remains. Third, while   Funding
            the analysis included the most epidemiologically significant
            SARS-CoV-2 variants, it may not capture the evolutionary   None.
            dynamics of rare or geographically restricted lineages.   Conflict of interest
            Fourth, evolutionary rate estimates are constrained by the
            availability and geographic distribution of sequencing data,   The authors declare they have no competing interests.
            which may overrepresent certain SARS-CoV-2 variants
            due to sequencing concentration in high-income countries.   Author contributions
            Fifth,  although recombination was  incorporated into  the   Conceptualization: Malik Sallam
            modeling, its true long-term impact on divergence is not   Data curation: All authors
            fully understood. Sixth, inferences about transmissibility   Formal analysis: Saja Al-Baidhani, Malik Sallam
            were drawn from epidemiological data rather than direct   Investigation: All authors
            experimental comparisons, which were beyond the scope of   Methodology: All authors
            this study. Finally, while the proposed classification system   Project administration: Malik Sallam
            aims to guide future policy and research, its global adoption   Supervision: Malik Sallam
            will require coordination and consensus among international   Validation: Saja Al-Baidhani, Malik Sallam
            public health authorities with potentially divergent priorities.  Visualization: Malik Sallam
                                                               Writing – original draft: Malik Sallam
            5. Conclusion                                      Writing – review & editing: All authors
            The classification of SARS-CoV-2 variants has profoundly
            shaped public health policy, vaccine development, and   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            global perceptions throughout the pandemic. However, the   Not applicable.
            analysis suggests that many of these classifications have not
            been consistently anchored in robust virological criteria,   Consent for publication
            highlighting an opportunity to enhance the present system   Not applicable.
            with more biologically grounded standards. Comparative
            genomic analyses demonstrate that the maximum      Availability of data
            divergence among SARS-CoV-2 variants (0.006  s/s) is
            substantially below the thresholds used to define subtypes   The data presented in this study are available on request
            in HIV-1, HCV, or influenza A virus. Even under accelerated   from the corresponding author (Malik Sallam).
            evolutionary scenarios, the virus would require centuries   References
            to reach divergence levels warranting lineage designation.
            These findings challenge the prevailing narrative of rapid,   1.   Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, et al. The species severe
            unpredictable  viral  evolution  and instead  suggest  that   acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: Classifying
            SARS-CoV-2 remains evolutionarily constrained. The    2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2.  Nat Microbiol.
            frequent and inconsistent designation of  VOCs has led   2020;5(4):536-544.
            to public confusion, reactionary policy decisions, and the      doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
            diversion of scientific resources. To address these issues, an   2.   Lu R, Zhao X, Li J,  et al. Genomic characterisation and
            evidence-based framework integrating genetic, functional,   epidemiology  of  2019  novel  coronavirus:  Implications
            and epidemiological criteria is proposed to classify SARS-  for virus origins and receptor binding.  Lancet.
            CoV-2 variants. Under this proposed framework, none   2020;395(10224):565-574.
            of the existing SARS-CoV-2 VOCs meet the combined      doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30251-8
            genetic and functional thresholds typically required for
            lineage-level classification in other RNA viruses. Rather   3.   Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. A pneumonia outbreak
                                                                  associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.
            than replacing present classification systems, the proposed   Nature. 2020;579(7798):270-273.
            approach advocates for a paradigm shift that distinguishes
            persistent evolutionary patterns from short-term genetic      doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
            fluctuations –  to support more  proportionate,  evidence-  4.   Rosen CJ. Viral variants, vaccinations, and long covid - new
            based responses in future phases of the pandemic.     insights. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(6):561-562.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025)                        100                           doi: 10.36922/MI025190042
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113