Page 58 - MSAM-1-1
P. 58

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                      From 3D printed molds to bioprinted scaffolds


            Conflict of interest                                  polymerization‐based 3D printing.  Adv Healthc Mater,
                                                                  9: 2000156.
            There are no conflicts to declare.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156
            Author contributions                               8.   Ahangar P, Cooke ME, Weber MH,  et al., 2019. Current

            Conceptualization:  Hamed  I.  Albalawi,  Zainab  N.  Khan,   biomedical  applications  of 3D  printing and  additive
               Sherin Abdelrahman, Charlotte A. E. Hauser         manufacturing. Appl Sci, 9: 1713.
                                                               9.   Guzzi EA, Tibbitt MW, 2020, Additive manufacturing of
            Investigation:  Zainab N.  Khan, Hamed I.  Albalawi,   precision biomaterials. Adv Mater, 32: 1901994.
               Alexander U. Valle-Pérez, Ali Aldoukhi, Noofa
               Hammad, Elena Herrera-Ponce de León             10.  Albalawi HI, Khan ZN, Valle-Pérez AU, et al., 2021, Sustainable
                                                                  and eco-friendly coral restoration through 3d printing and
            Methodology: Hamed I. Albalawi, Zainab N. Khan        fabrication. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 9: 12634-12645.

            Software: Zainab N. Khan, Noofa Hammad             11.  Sasmal P, Datta P, Wu Y,  et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting for
            Supervision: Charlotte A. E. Hauser                   modelling vasculature. Microphysiol Syst, 2: 9.
            Validation: Ali Aldoukhi, Alexander U. Valle-Pérez, Zainab      https://doi.org/10.21037/mps.2018.10.02
               N. Khan                                         12.  Janarthanan G, Shin HS, Kim IG,  et al., 2020, Self-
                                                                  crosslinking  hyaluronic  acid–carboxymethylcellulose
            Visualization: Alexander U. Valle-Pérez, Hamed I. Albalawi
                                                                  hydrogel enhances multilayered 3D-printed construct shape
            Writing – original draft: Zainab N. Khan, Hamed I.    integrity and mechanical stability for soft tissue engineering.
               Albalawi, Alexander U. Valle-Pérez, Ali Aldoukhi,   Biofabrication, 12: 045026.
               Noofa Hammad, Elena Herrera-Ponce de León          https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2f7

            Writing – review & editing: Zainab N. Khan, Charlotte A.   13.  Gopinathan J, Noh I, 2018, Recent trends in bioinks for 3D
               E. Hauser                                          printing. Biomater Res, 22: 11.

            References                                         14.  Avila-Ramírez A, Valle-Pérez AU, Susapto HH, et al., 2021,
                                                                  Ecologically friendly biofunctional ink for reconstruction
            1.   Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and   of rigid living systems under wet conditions.  In J
               organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32: 773–785.               Bioprint, 7: 398.
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958                   https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.398
            2.   Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S,  et al. 2019,   15.  Tirella A, Orsini A, Vozzi G, et al., 2009, A phase diagram
               Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging   for microfabrication of geometrically controlled hydrogel
               technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Phys Rev,   scaffolds. Biofabrication, 1: 045002.
               6: 011310.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/1/4/045002
               https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5059393
                                                               16.  Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M,  et al., 2017,
            3.   Li X, Liu B, Pei B,  et al., 2020, Inkjet bioprinting of   3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA)
               biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120: 10793-10833.          hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity.  PLoS One, 12:
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008        e0177628.
            4.   Ng WL, Lee JM, Yeong WY, et al., 2017, Microvalve-based      https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177628
               bioprinting-process, bio-inks and applications. Biomater Sci,   17.  Susapto HH, Alhattab D, Abdelrahman S,  et al., 2021,
               5: 632–647.                                        Ultrashort peptide bioinks support automated printing of
            5.   Dou C, Perez V, Qu J, et al., 2021, A state‐of‐the‐art review   large-scale constructs assuring long-term survival of printed
               of laser‐assisted bioprinting and its future research trends.   tissue constructs. Nano Lett, 21: 2719–2729.
               Chem Bio Eng Rev, 8: 517–534.                      https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04426

               https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202000037          18.  Hauser CA, Deng R, Mishra A, et al., 2011, Natural tri- to
            6.   Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization-  hexapeptides self-assemble in water to amyloid β-type fiber
               based bioprinting process, materials, applications and   aggregates by unexpected á-helical intermediate structures.
               regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12: 022001.  Proc Natl Acad Sci, 108: 1361–1366.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034           https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014796108
            7.   Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent advances   19.  Loo Y, Lakshmanan A, Ni M, et al., 2015, Peptide bioink:
               in formulating and processing biomaterial inks for vat   Self-assembling nanofibrous scaffolds for three-dimensional

            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2022)                         8                      https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i1.7
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63