Page 54 - MSAM-3-1
P. 54

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                       Adhesion study for multi-material 3D printing




             A                                             B
























                                                            D
             C
























            Figure 6. (A) Schematic showing the labels of two scanned fracture surfaces, with (i) representing the fracture surface of the material that is printed last
            and (ii) representing the fracture surface of the material that is printed first (B–D) 3D reconstructed height map showing the typical surface morphology
            of the fracture surfaces of the interfaces of coupons for no modification, interlocking feature, and top infill modification, respectively. Abbreviations:
            cPLA: conductive polylactic acid; TPU: Thermoplastic polyurethane.

            adhesion strength and the fracture mode. In particular, we   attributed to the design/toolpath that is being used to print
            wanted to observe the surface morphology of the material   the topmost layer of the first material. It is widely known
            situated below the interface (the material that is printed   that FFF printing inherently produces parts with grooves
            first). In both cases, we observed that the coupons have   form between the filaments, explaining why some small
            a relatively flat surface with some undulations scattered   grooves and valleys are observed on the fractured surface
            over the region. For the case of coupons with unmodified   of the coupons with unmodified interface. In contrast,
            interface, the surface appears to be relatively flat with very   for the case of coupons with top infill modification,
            few grooves or valleys, as shown in Figure 6B-ii, regardless   we intentionally made the gaps between the  filament
            of the print order. Similar observations can also be made   significantly larger, making the filament on the topmost
            for  the  coupons  with  top infill  modifications,  but  with   layer sparsely distributed. This explains why the sparsely
            a  much wider  grooves  scattered over  the  flat  fractured   distributed filaments appear as the peaks in the height map.
            surface. The difference in the surface morphology can be   Figure 6B-i and D-i show the surface morphology of the


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)                         9                       https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.2672
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59