Page 51 - MSAM-3-2
P. 51

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                              Heat treatment on bimetallic parts




                         A                                                     B






                                                                               C










                                                                         D










            Figure 1. The illustration of the ES-AM process and the fabricated 17-4PH/IN625 bimetal part. (A) An illustration ES-AM process with a dual nozzle
            system (B) A bimetallic material after printing. (C) The top perspective of the sintered component. (D) Profile of the sintered component, showcasing
            geometrical details. Scale bars: 2 mm.
            Abbreviation: ES-AM: Extrusion-based sintering-assisted additive manufacturing.

            Table 1. Material properties for 17‑4PH and IN625 filament   uniformity.  One of the recommended heat treatment
                                                                        34
            and optimized printing parameters for 17‑4PH/IN625   procedures for the IN625 alloy involves subjecting it
            bimetallic green part                              to a solutionizing operation at 1150°C. This thermal
            Parameters                17‑4PH       IN625       processing  step  serves  to  eliminate  compositional
                                                               inhomogeneities, eliminate secondary phases present,
            Filament                                           trigger recrystallization phenomena, and promote grain
             Version                    V2           -         coarsening.   The  aging  temperature  and  duration  were
                                                                        35
             Diameter                 1.75 mm      1.75 mm     adjusted for specific applications to balance strength
             Specification           400 cc/spool  200 cc/spool  and toughness while controlling tempered martensite
             Composition                 20 vol.% wax, 20 vol.%   and precipitation. In addition, an aging heat treatment
                                     polyethylene, and 60 vol.% powder  was employed (482°C for 1  h holding time), following
            Optimized printing parameters                      HT8 to enhance hardness. Rapid cooling through water
             Nozzle temperature        230°C        210°C      quenching was implemented for the samples to promote
             Bed temperature           80°C         80°C       expedited heat extraction and mitigate the potential for
             Chamber temperature       60°C         60°C       carbide precipitation, especially within the temperature
                                                               regime of 1150°C sustained for 8 h. Figure 2 illustrates the
             Nozzle size              0.4 mm       0.4 mm
             Layer thickness          0.1 mm       0.1 mm      heat treatment conditions used during the experiments.
             Infill density            100%         100%       2.2. Microstructure characterizations and
             Speed                    40 mm/s      40 mm/s     mechanical properties
            Infill orientation          45°         135°       To investigate the microstructure and microhardness,
                                                               bimetallic samples were prepared in both as-sintered
            of martensite. Considering factors such as the presence   and heat-treated states. Pore distribution and grain
            of NbC and oxides, as well as the dimensions of prior   morphology were analyzed using optical microscopy
            austenite grain and martensite lath, the homogenization   (OM; Olympus DSX 510, Olympus, Japan) and scanning
            temperature was set at 1150°C to ensure adequate   electron microscopy (SEM; Supra 55-VP, Zeiss, Germany).


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2024)                         4                              doi: 10.36922/msam.3281
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56