Page 52 - MSAM-3-2
P. 52

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                              Heat treatment on bimetallic parts




            Table 2. The alloy composition of the 17‑4PH and IN625 feedstocks
            Weight %     Cr     Fe       Ni        Nb       Mo     Mn     Si   C     Cu     Co    Other elements
            17-4PH     15 – 17.5  Balance  3 – 5  0.15 – 0.45  -    1     1    0.07  3 – 5   -        0.07
            IN625       20 – 23  5       Balance  3.15 – 4.15  8 – 10  0.5  0.5  0.1  -      1        0.82


            Table 3. Material properties of 17‑4PH and IN625   USA), followed by observation through OM. XRD analyses
                                                               were employed to identify the phase constituents present in
            Material properties     17‑4PH V2      IN625       the bimetallic samples. Microindentation hardness testing
            Relative density          >96.5%       >96.5%      following ASTM E384 guidelines was conducted utilizing a
            Hardness (HRC)              36           7         Vickers hardness tester (LM-310AT, LECO, USA). The test
            Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)  1180   765        was conducted with a load of 1.0 kg, an approach speed of
            0.2% yield strength (MPa)  710          334        60 μm/s, and a measurement period lasting 10 s.
            Elongation at break        7%           42%        3. Results and discussion
            Corrosion                 Good        Excellent
                                                               3.1. Interface characterization
            Thermal coefficient     10.8×10 /°C 16  12.8×10 /°C 17
                                                      -6
                                         -6
                                                               The microstructure of the interface between 17-4PH and
                                                               IN625 after heat treatment reveals metallurgical bonding,
                                                               as depicted in Figure 3. Figure 3A-D depicts the variation
                                                               in pore population and dimensions across the polished
                                                               surface subjected to distinct heat treatment conditions.
                                                               The grain morphology of 17-4PH after surface etching
                                                               with Marble’s reagent is presented in Figure 3A1-D1. Small
                                                               pores  (dark  pores)  were  distributed  within  the  17-4PH
                                                               parts due to insufficient densification when employing the
                                                               sintering profiles for IN625. Nevertheless, with an increase
                                                               in holding time, the pore size decreased owing to the heat
                                                               contribution facilitating densification to a certain extent.
                                                                                                            36
                                                               Typical martensitic and ferrite phases were observed on the
                                                               17-4PH side of the interface, resulting from the precipitation
                                                               hardening process.  Concurrently, the grain size of
                                                                               37
                                                               17-4PH initially decreased and subsequently increased
                                                               with increasing holding time, a phenomenon attributable
            Figure 2. Schematic overview of heat treatment conditions.  to recrystallization and grain growth induced by excessive
            Abbreviations: AC: Air cooling; WQ: Water quenching.  heat input.  The chemical etching process did not reveal
                                                                        32
                                                               the phase composition of IN625; however, subsequent XRD
            Initially, the samples were sectioned transversely relative   analysis confirmed the presence of the austenitic phase,
            to the building direction and embedded in epoxy to   corroborating the findings reported in the literature. 38
            ensure secure fixation. The process involved grinding   No  evident  intermetallic  phases  were  formed  at  the
            and polishing, culminating in a final polish utilizing   interface  under  different  heat  treatment  conditions,
            an alumina suspension with a  particle  size  of  0.25  μm.   which aligns with the findings in the relevant literature.
                                                                                                             5
            After polishing, the samples underwent microstructural   In Figure 3A-D, the interface is marked by a band with
            characterization utilizing  an SEM  integrated with  an   a lighter appearance, which lacks visible grain structure,
            energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system to   suggesting an absence of grain development in this
            analyze the elemental distribution across the interfacial   transition zone. Figure 3 illustrates that the thickness of
            region. Meanwhile, internal porosity was assessed using   the interfacial white bands did not significantly vary with
            OM at ×40 magnification, followed by the analysis of the   extended holding times, maintaining an approximate
            polished internal surfaces of cut samples using ImageJ   width of 60 μm in both as-sintered and heat-treated states.
            software (National Institutes of Health, USA). To reveal   Significantly, the precipitation of minute particulates,
            the grain structure, chemical etching was performed using   visible  as  black  dots  in  Figure  3,  was  localized  within
            Marble’s and Kalling’s 2 reagents (ES Laboratory, LCC,   the IN625 alloy region. Meanwhile, as time increases,


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2024)                         5                              doi: 10.36922/msam.3281
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57