Page 55 - MSAM-3-3
P. 55

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                   MEX optimization printing of rHPDE from milk jugs



            4.4. Printing on print beds with different surface
            roughness
            The results of prints on the smooth and roughened
            surfaces are presented in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The
            correlations between PT, PBT, and print bed adhesion
            were further investigated. Parts that met the criteria for
            good adhesion to the print bed and easy removal after
            printing were printed at lower temperatures (both PT
            and PBT). For example, parts printed at a PT of 210°C
            were easily removable (Table 3). Conversely, parts
            printed at a PT of 240°C and PBT of 24°C required a more
            challenging removal process, which could potentially
            damage both the part and the print bed. Parts printed
            at a PT of 240°C and PBT of 50°C were impossible to
            remove by hand.
              In addition, it was observed that printing at lower
            temperatures (both PBTs and PTs) resulted in increased
            warping, which is not desirable.                   Figure 4. Predicted adhesion in relation to print temperature and
                                                               measured print bed temperature
            4.5. Printing with different print beds and PTs
                                                               content, resulting in different polymer compositions and
            We quantitatively assessed the effects of varying PTs and   properties. Therefore, further work may be necessary to
            PBTs, determined the shear strength of the print bed   investigate the use of other rHDPE sources, such as bottle
            adhesion, and evaluated the ease of part removal from the   caps, different milk jugs, or a combination of sources,
            print bed.
                                                               considering that HDPE is a commonly used packaging
              The aluminum print bed improves the heat transfer   plastic found in numerous products.
            from the heater plate to the print surface, ensuring that
            the print surface matches the temperature set for the print.   Furthermore, it is important to conduct further
            Furthermore, using an enclosure during printing mitigates   investigation to evaluate and improve the interlayer
            the impact of unpredictable external air movements,   adhesion of the printed parts, as weak adhesion may lead
            maintaining a more stable environment for printing. This is   to interlayer delamination (cracking) during printing or
            important as such air movements can lead to inconsistent   part removal.
            cooling due to convection. 17                        Warpage may still occur even within the temperature

              The adhesion strengths between the printed parts   range recommended in Section 4.5. Exploring the use
            and the print bed were examined using a shear test by   of brims or raft options during printing might further
            tension loading (Figure 3). The shear strength values are   improve print bed adhesion and should be considered.
            summarized in Table 6. From the table, a linear regression   Finally, only cursory measurements on surface
            model  was  plotted,  resulting  in  a  predictive  function   finishing and mechanical characteristics of the extruded
            (Equation II) that relates print bed adhesion, PBT, and PT.
            A surface plot demonstrating this relationship is depicted   rHDPE filament and printed samples have been carried
            in Figure 4. The recommended PBT range is between 30°C   out, as these readings are similar to those reported in
                                                                            8,19-21
            and 45°C and PT between 220°C and 235°C according to   previous studies.   Thus, no further characterization of
            the relationship shown in Figure 4.                the materials or substrates was followed up, as these are
                                                               already reported in the literature.
            Predicted adhesion = 37.7 + (0.18 × PBT) + (0.15 × PT)  (II)
                                                                 In summary, the purpose of this study was to explore
            4.6. Limitations and recommendations               the recycling methodology of HDPE from used milk jugs
            The milk jugs from Meiji Co. used in this project were   into printable filaments. While the results are promising,
            assumed to be from the same source and to have the same   further investigation and streamlining of the protocol are
            chemical composition. However, it should be noted that   warranted, and the current potential application for this
            the results obtained from this study may not apply to other   work would be in education to promote the concepts of
            sources of rHDPE due to potential variations in additive   sustainability and waste reduction.


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         12                             doi: 10.36922/msam.4084
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60