Page 153 - MSAM-4-3
P. 153

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                 L-PBF Ti-10Ta-2Nb-2Zr: Microstructure and Strength



            chosen to ensure complete transformation to the β-phase   The design of TPMS architectures took into
            field, as it is approximately 40°C above the measured   consideration the technological limitations and capabilities
            β-transus finish temperature (862°C). This temperature   of the L-PBF process. The sample dimensions were selected
            was selected to promote full recrystallization of the   according to the work of Soro et al.,  whereas the unit cell
                                                                                           28
            as-built microstructure while minimizing grain growth.   size was adapted to account for the technical specifications
            Furnace cooling was selected to promote the formation of   of the printer used. The chosen parameters ensure that
            a stable lamellar α + β microstructure, balancing strength   key structural elements comply with the minimum
            and ductility, which is critical for load-bearing orthopedic   permissible dimensions for our L-PBF equipment while
            implants.                                          maintaining the required mechanical properties. The
                                                               selected TPMS architecture types (Schwarz, gyroid,
            2.4. TPMS structures                               and split) represent designs whose feasibility in L-PBF
            As  part  of  the  investigation  into  the  effects  of  cellular   processes has been confirmed by previous studies. 29,30
            structures on the mechanical properties of alloys,   Nevertheless, the geometric features of these structures
            experimental samples with three different TPMS     lead to variations in manufacturing accuracy. Among
            architecture types were designed and fabricated: Schwarz,   the considered variants, the split structure, characterized
            gyroid, and split (Figure 2). Computer-aided design of   by the  smallest constructive  elements,  demonstrates an
            the TPMS architectures was performed using nTopology   increased susceptibility to manufacturing imperfections
            software (Version 3.0, nTopology Inc., USA). To ensure   compared to gyroid and Schwarz structures, which is
            an optimal balance between mechanical characteristics   reflected  in  the  variability  of  mechanical  properties.  To
            and L-PBF manufacturing capabilities, a unit cell size   ensure uniformity in production conditions and resulting
            of 1.5  mm was established for all architecture types.   mechanical characteristics, all experimental samples were
            Adjustment of the wall thickness was performed to   manufactured  with  the  longitudinal  axis  of  the  cylinder
            achieve the target volumetric porosity of 50%. For   oriented along the build direction. The positioning strategy
            mechanical compression testing, cylindrical specimens   and technological  parameters were  optimized based on
            with TPMS architecture were constructed with       published data on the successful fabrication of TPMS
            dimensions of 6 mm in diameter and 12 mm in height.   structures from Ti alloys. In addition, an investigation
            During manufacturing, the samples were positioned so   of the printed gyroid lattice structure was conducted to
            that the longitudinal axis of the cylinder aligned with the   evaluate the influence of lattice geometry on the resulting
            build direction.                                   microstructure, which established a relationship between
                                                               the topological features of the cellular construction and
            A               B              C                   microstructural parameters in various regions of the
                                                               Ti-10Ta-2Nb-2Zr alloy specimen.

                                                               2.5. Characterization methods
                                                               2.5.1. Density analysis
                                                               The density of the fabricated samples was measured using
                                                               the Archimedes method (hydrostatic weighing) with an
                                                               analytical balance (XS205, Mettler Toledo, Switzerland)
                                                               equipped with a density measurement kit. Distilled water
                                                               was used as the immersion medium, and measurements
                                                               were conducted at 22 ± 0.5°C. Four measurements were
                                                               taken for each sample to ensure statistical reliability.
                                                                 The theoretical density of the Ti-10Ta-2Nb-2Zr alloy was
                                                               calculated using thermodynamic calculations in JMatPro
                                                               11 software (11.0, Sente Software Ltd., United Kingdom),
                                                               which provides accurate density predictions based on the
                                                               chemical composition and phase equilibria of the alloy
                                                               system.
                                                                 The relative density was determined as the ratio of the
            Figure 2. Designs of triply periodic minimal surface samples. (A) Schwarz;   measured density (obtained using Archimedes’ method) to
            (B) gyroid; (C) split                              the theoretical density (calculated using JMatPro 11).


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         5                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM025220044
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158