Page 160 - TD-3-4
P. 160

Tumor Discovery                                                 CK2 deregulation in non-small-cell lung cancer



            CSNK2B-TSS1500/1stExon/5’UTR (Spearman: −0.26;     in LUAD (Rho  = 0.43) (Figure  S7D-F). Overall, the
            P = 9.54e-9) (Figure S3B).                         strongest and most significant correlations were observed
                                                               between CSNK2A1 and MDSC infiltration (Rho = 0.283,
            3.3. Prognostic impact of CSNK2A1 and CSNK2B       P = 1.49e-10) and between CSNK2B and MDSC infiltration
            overexpression in LUAD                             (Rho = 0.43, P = 1.20e-23) in LUAD specimens.
            We investigated whether the overexpression of  CSNK2
            subunits correlates with reduced OS in clinical cohorts of   3.5. Heightened CK-2 protein subunit levels and
            NSCLC. Initially, we confirmed that CSNK2 mRNA levels   enzymatic activity in LUAD and lung squamous
            were consistently overexpressed across various tumor types,   carcinoma specimens
            including NSCLC, except for CSNK2A2 in LUAD (Figure S4).   To assess CK2 protein subunit levels and enzymatic
            Particularly, CSNK2A1 upregulation was substantially higher   activity in NSCLC, we carried out IHC analysis on primary
            than that of CSNK2A2 in LUAD (fold change: 1.40 vs. 0.95)   LUAD and LUSC specimens from treatment-naive
            and LUSC (fold change: 2.13 vs. 1.23) (Figure S4A and B),   patients. CK2 subunit staining frequency and intensity
            while CSNK2B displayed comparable expression levels in both   varied across examined tissues but were consistently
            LUAD and LUSC (LUAD: 1.35 vs. LUSC:1.40) (Figure S4C).   higher than in tumor-matched para-neoplastic tissues
            In alignment with CSNK2A1 and CSNK2B overexpression, a   (Figures  5  and  S8). CK2 subunits localized to both the
            meta-analysis of mRNA expression versus OS indicated that   nuclear and cytosolic compartments, while the Ki67
            elevated of both subunits correlated with a poorer prognosis   proliferation marker predominantly appeared in the
            in LUAD but not LUSC patients (CSNK2A1: LUAD hazard   nuclear region (Figure 5A).
            ratio [HR] = 1.17,  P  < 0.01; LUSC HR = 1.07,  P  = 0.72;   To  quantify  protein  levels  of  CSNK2A1,  CSNK2A2,
            CSNK2B: LUAD HR = 1.11,  P  < 0.01;  LUSC HR = 0.93,   and CSNK2B in NSCLC tumors and corresponding
            P = 0.16) (Figure 3). Conversely, CSNK2A2 overexpression   para-neoplastic tissues, we applied a CIS incorporating
            in LUAD was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.92,   frequency  and signal intensity  (Table  1).  CIS  results  for
            P = 0.01) (Figure S5).                             Ki67 corroborated the aberrant growth of these tumors.
              It is worth noting that, although data on metastatic   The CIS analysis demonstrated that all CK2 protein
            samples are limited and not stratified by NSCLC subtypes,   subunits  were significantly  elevated in  NSCLC tumors
            preliminary findings suggest that CSNK2A1 (P = 1.28e-5)   compared to para-neoplastic tissues (Table 1). To further
            and CSNK2B (P = 1.33e-6), but not CSNK2A2 (P = 0.52),   assess tumor specificity, we calculated CIS ratios (R) by
            could be linked to lung metastasis (Figure S6).    dividing tumor (T) score by para-neoplastic (PN) score, as
            3.4. Correlation of CSNK2 subunit expression with   shown in Equation I:
            tumor infiltration by specific cell populations      R = T/PN                                  (1)
            The oncogenic potential of CK2 has been linked to both   The ratio served as an indicator for tumor-specific
            tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic factors.  Using   marker  association.  The  CSNK2A1  subunit  exhibited
                                                   24
            various metrics to quantify the infiltration of immune and   nearly two-fold higher tumor specificity (R = 3.9) than
            stromal cells in tumors, we found that elevated CSNK2A1   CSNK2B (R = 2.1) and CSNK2A2 (R = 1.7) (Figure 6A).
            mRNA expression levels were correlated with increased   This specificity was further reinforced by analyzing samples
            infiltration of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) and   with positive-to-strong positive (++/+++) staining, where
            myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) across multiple   CSNK2A1 showed a significantly higher tumor specificity
            tumor subtypes (Figure 4A).                        (R = 18.3) than CSNK2A2 and CSNK2B (R = 3.1 – 3.2)
              Tumor infiltration by CAFs showed a positive correlation   (Figure 6A).
            with  CSNK2A1 mRNA overexpression according to       Subsequently, we correlated the CIS values for each
            three out of four metrics in both LUAD (CAF_TIDE,   CK2  subunit  with  selected  pathophysiological  features
            Rho = 0.185) and LUSC (CAF_TIDE, Rho = 0.164). MDSC   in NSCLC patients (Tables S1 and S2). Protein levels
            infiltration showed a stronger correlation with CSNK2A1   of the CSNK2A1 subunit showed a positive correlation
            in LUAD (MDSC_TIDE, Rho = 0.283) compared to LUSC   with smoking habit, tumor histology, tumor size, and
            (MDSC_TIDE, Rho = 0.212) (Figure 4B and C). In contrast,   clinical stage (Table S1). In contrast, elevated levels of the
            weaker correlations were observed for CSNK2A2 in both   CSNK2A2 subunit correlated only with tumor histology
            LUAD and LUSC (Figure  S7A-C). In addition,  CSNK2B   (Table S2). Notably, the catalytic CK2 subunits, CSNK2A1
            expression levels correlated with MDSC infiltration in   and CSNK2A2, were more highly expressed in LUSC than
            both NSCLC subtypes, with a relatively high correlation   LUAD samples (Figure 6B; Tables S1 and S2).


            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         6                                 doi: 10.36922/td.4571
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165