Page 118 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 118

Takele, et al.

                 Table 4. The soil and water assessment tool model   standard of 85% and a kappa coefficient of >0.85. In
                 performance metrics                                this study, 50 ground truth data points per land-use class

                 Gauging station  Model stage  Objective function   in the watershed were utilized to optimize the accuracy
                                              R 2  NSE    PBIAS     of  classification  (Table  5).  The  accuracy  assessment
                                                                    result achieved PA and UA values that met the required
                 Germam          Calibration  0.84  0.75   −0.1     standard, allowing for further analysis. 35
                                 Validation  0.79  0.72    −11
                 Abbreviations: NSE: Nash-sutcliffe efficiency; PBIAS: Percent   3.2. LULC change
                 bias.                                              This study analyzed the effects of LULC changes on
                                                                    groundwater  recharge  in  the  Dire  Dawa watershed
                and validation  phases.  The SWAT model  performed   from 2000 to 2022. Six dominant LULC classes, that
                well during both the calibration and validation periods.   is, shrubland, forest, agriculture, settlement, desert, and
                The model closely matched the observed data with an   river  sand,  were  identified  for  the  years  2000,  2010,
                R  of 0.84 during calibration and 0.79 in validation.   and 2022 (Figure 5). The results show that agricultural
                 2
                The SWAT model accurately  estimated  groundwater   and built-up areas increased while shrubland decreased.
                recharge, with NSE  values of 0.75 (calibration)  and   In addition, forest land, which covered approximately
                0.72 (validation) and minimal bias (PBIAS: −0.1 and   85.3 km (12.1%) in 2000, was drastically reduced to
                                                                            2
                −11, respectively). These results confirm its reliability   55.7 km (7.9%) by 2010 (Table 6). These alterations
                                                                            2
                for water resource management in the region.        are  primarily  attributed  to  agricultural  expansion  and
                                                                    urbanization  in  this  region.  Impunity  led  to  changes
                2.2.8. Groundwater recharge estimation using the    in  the watershed’s hydrology,  modifying  water
                SWAT and change detection                           infiltration, soil erosion, evapotranspiration, and runoff
                In this study, groundwater recharge in the Dire Dawa   patterns. These results highlight the growing problem
                watershed was  assessed  using the SWAT model,      of land degradation and underscore the importance of
                combined with remote sensing data and environmental   sustainable  land management and soil conservation
                variables. To isolate the impact of LULC changes on   as a safeguard against groundwater depletion and
                hydrological processes, change detection was performed   maintaining  hydrological  equilibrium  within the
                using satellite imagery from 2000, 2010, and 2020. The   watershed.
                LULC maps were compared  using several  methods,       Remotely  sensed  imagery  plays  a  significant  role
                including  image  differencing,  which  highlighted   in monitoring LULC conversion, offering high spatial
                significant land cover changes by subtracting one map   and  temporal  resolution  for area  conversion.  In this
                from  another;  post-classified  comparison,  where  each   study, a mixed  approach  involving  both supervised
                year’s  LULC  map  was  independently  classified  and   and  unsupervised  image  classification  was  employed,
                then  compared  to quantify  the  changes;  and change   as it is widely used in remote  sensing data  analysis.
                matrix  analysis,  which assessed the  accuracy  of the   This method focuses on the transitions between LULC
                LULC classifications and the nature of the transitions.   classes and provides explicit information,  facilitating
                These change detection results were integrated into the   the interpretation of valuable  patterns.  Areal extent
                SWAT model to simulate how varying LULC scenarios   measurements  across  different  temporal  periods  were
                influenced  groundwater  recharge  and  surface  runoff.   used to estimate the magnitude of LULC changes. The
                This approach provides a clear understanding of how   results of the LULC change analysis for the years 2000,
                LULC changes influence hydrological processes, while   2010, and 2022, presented in  Figure  5 and  Table  6,
                accounting for other factors that may affect groundwater   illustrate the spatial and temporal variability of LULC
                recharge and surface runoff.                        across the watershed during the study period.

                3. Results                                          3.3. Hydrological impacts of LULC changes
                                                                    The impacts of LULC changes on the groundwater
                3.1. Accuracy assessment                            recharge and surface runoff in the Dire Dawa watershed
                This research utilized  LULC maps from 2000, 2010,   from  2000 to  2022 were evaluated  using the  SWAT
                and 2022, created using ERDAS IMAGINE 2015 and      model.  The  water  balance  components,  specifically
                ArcGIS 10.8 software. Ground truth data were collected   recharge and runoff, were estimated independently for
                using GPS and Google Earth Pro, achieving an accuracy   each study period. Change detection was then conducted



                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                       112                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025180139
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123