Page 18 - AJWEP-22-6

Syromiatnykov

regulatory evaluation, and support the development while more environmentally costly, remain financially
of bioactive humic formulations tailored to specific attractive due to subsidies or bulk availability.
microbial consortia or soil types. Cost-benefit analyses from pilot trials in India
The interaction between humic compounds and and Brazil have demonstrated that humic-enhanced
synthetic nitrogen fertilizers also introduces complexity. inoculation can increase soybean yields by 20–40%,
Transcriptomic evidence indicates that humic substances resulting in net profit gains of USD 80–120/ha after
can reduce the negative effects of nitrogen oversupply subtracting input costs. These benefits are especially
78
on root nodulation and symbiotic activity. However, the pronounced under organic or low-input systems, where
molecular pathways responsible for this mitigation are synthetic inputs are restricted or discouraged. However,
not yet well-characterized, which limits our ability to under conventional high-input regimes, marginal gains
optimize co-application strategies. 86 may be lower unless humic-microbial packages replace
A major barrier to widespread adoption is the lack existing fertilizer inputs.
of standardization in humic product manufacturing. The Scalability also depends on decentralizing
chemical composition of humic substances varies widely production through on-farm or regional composting and
depending on the feedstock source and processing humification units that utilize local waste streams. Such
techniques, resulting in inconsistent field outcomes strategies can reduce transportation and processing
and posing challenges for regulatory compliance and costs by up to 40%, making bio-based formulations
product labeling. 64 more accessible for small-scale use. Public-private
85
To improve standardization, humic substance partnerships and certification schemes (e.g., carbon
characterization should follow established analytical credits or eco-labeling) could further improve cost-
protocols combining elemental, spectroscopic, and efficiency by monetizing environmental co-benefits
functional group profiling. Key parameters include the such as reduced emissions or enhanced soil carbon
C/N ratio, total humic acid content, and aromaticity sequestration.
index derived from UV-Vis absorbance at 465 and Overall, while humic-microbial biotechnologies
665 nm (E4/E6 ratio). FTIR and C-NMR can be used to display positive economic returns under specific
13
assess the presence of carboxyl, phenolic, and aliphatic management systems, further regional studies and
functional groups, while thermogravimetric analysis decision-support tools are needed to tailor cost-effective
provides information on stability and decomposition packages for diverse agroecological and socioeconomic
profiles. Standardized descriptors, such as the Humic contexts.
substance index and redox buffering capacity, are also However, sewage sludge-derived humic products
useful for quality benchmarking across products and may pose environmental risks due to the potential
production batches. 64,87 accumulation of heavy metals such as cadmium, lead,
From a logistical standpoint, large-scale deployment and mercury. Pisarek and Grata highlighted that certain
46
of these technologies faces several hurdles. Existing sludge-based humates exceeded permissible thresholds
fertilization protocols are not yet adapted to include for Zn and Cu, raising concerns for long-term soil and
microbial or humic biostimulants, and there is limited crop safety. These findings emphasize the need for
availability of precision equipment for synchronized rigorous quality control and metal screening protocols
delivery. In addition, long-term field studies are before the field application of sludge-derived products.
warranted to assess their influence on soil microbiota, Despite numerous reports of synergistic effects
nutrient cycling, and the sustainability of crop rotation between humic substances and nitrogen-fixing bacteria,
systems. 88,89 not all studies have yielded statistically significant or
Economic feasibility remains a critical determinant agronomically meaningful results. For instance, field trials
for the adoption of humic-microbial technologies, conducted in sandy soils of sub-Saharan Africa and arid
especially among smallholder and resource-constrained zones of Central Asia have reported limited improvements
farmers. Although the integration of bioinoculants in nodulation or yield despite the application of humic-
and humic products offers long-term agronomic and enhanced inoculants. Such inconsistencies are often
88
ecological benefits, their initial costs may present barriers attributed to rapid leaching of bio-inputs, unfavorable
to widespread uptake. The cost of formulated microbial- edaphic conditions, or poor compatibility between
humic products ranges from USD 15–35/ha, depending bacterial strains and local soil microbiota.
on the concentration, carrier type, and production Moreover, some greenhouse trials using co-inoculated
scale. In contrast, synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, humic products failed to outperform single inoculation
86

Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025) 12 doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025230190