Page 69 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 69

Pine sawdust biofuel: Quality and temperature optimization

                the dispersion degree of temperature data relative  to   3.3. Experimental steps
                the mean value. This parameter provides a measurable   This study is divided into three main parts: experimental
                characterization  of both  uniformity  and dispersion   preparation,  biomass  densification  testing,  and  data
                within the temperature field.                       analysis, as shown in Figure 1.
                                                                    (i)  Experimental  preparation:  Raw material  moisture
                3. Materials and methods                                content and binder addition ratio were adjusted to
                                                                        target values, followed by sealed storage.
                3.1. Experimental materials                         (ii)  Experimental  procedure:  The forming mold with
                The experimental materials consisted of pine sawdust    the temperature controller was  mounted on the
                (particle size <2.5 mm) containing 34–46% cellulose,    universal testing machine. Prepared materials were
                20–35% hemicellulose, and 26–34% lignin.  Molasses      loaded into the die for compression molding under
                                                       32
                served as the binder for biomass densification.         30-s pressure maintenance,  after which samples
                  Prior to experimentation, the moisture content of the   were extracted and stored at ambient conditions.
                biomass material (pine sawdust) required measurement   (iii) Post-experiment  processing:  The  relaxation
                and adjustment. The moisture content was determined     ratio,  relaxed  density, and  impact  resistance  of
                in accordance with the Chinese National Standard GB/T   each  test  group were calculated  and averaged  to
                1927.4-2021, calculated using the following formula in   ensure data reliability. Systematic data processing
                Equation VI:                                            was  performed  to  evaluate  the  effects  of  various
                                                                        parameters  on  densified  biofuel  quality  and
                    m −  m                                              temperature field distribution.
                W =   1   0  ×100 %                          (VI)
                      m 0
                                                                    4. Results and discussion
                  Where W is the moisture content (%), m is the mass
                of undried sawdust (g), and m is the mass of oven-dried   4.1. Experimental results of densified biofuel
                sawdust (g).                                        quality evaluation indicators
                  The pine sawdust was heated using a moisture      Following the experimental steps outlined in Sections
                analyzer until a constant mass  was  achieved.  The   2.1 and  3.3, a total  of 25 experimental  groups were
                initial  moisture  content  of the  pine  sawdust was   conducted in this study. Each group was repeated three
                determined  to be 8.3%. Fine water mist spraying    times, and the average values and standard errors were
                was employed to adjust the moisture content to the   calculated.  The  experimental  results  are  shown in
                required  experimental  range,  followed  by  sealed   Table 1.
                storage  under  ambient  conditions.  The  experimental   Experimental  results revealed  that  the  maximum
                environment was maintained at 15–25℃ with relative   relaxed density of 1.066 g/cm  was achieved at 50 MPa
                                                                                              3
                humidity ≤80%.                                      forming pressure with 10% moisture content, 2% binder
                                                                    addition ratio, and 160°C heating temperature.  The
                3.2. Experimental equipment                         minimum relaxation ratio of 1.009 occurred at 10 MPa
                The experimental  setup comprised a forming system   forming pressure with 14% moisture content, 4% binder
                and  measurement  instruments.  The  forming  system   addition ratio, and 190°C heating temperature. Optimal
                incorporated a mold with an integrated heating coil and   impact resistance (97.939%) was obtained at 40 MPa
                temperature controller, while measurement instruments   forming pressure with 10% moisture content, 4% binder
                included a universal testing machine (REGER Model   addition ratio, and 150°C heating temperature.
                4050; Shenzhen REGER Instrument Co., Ltd., China)      With  an  impact  resistance  threshold  of  ≥95%
                and  an  infrared  thermometer  (FLUKE  Ti95;  FLUKE   indicating satisfactory densification performance, 92%
                Test Instruments Co., Ltd., China)  with dedicated   of the 25 experimental groups produced good-quality
                software.                                           densified  biofuel.  Two  exceptions  failed  to  meet  the
                  The heating coil was precisely fitted to the mold’s   requirement: (i) at 20 MPa forming pressure with 16%
                outer circumference,  with temperature  regulation   moisture content, 2% binder addition ratio, and 150°C
                achieved  through the  controller.  The  mold  assembly,   temperature, and (ii) at 10 MPa forming pressure with
                installed on the universal testing machine, featured a   16% moisture content,  3% binder addition  ratio,  and
                polytetrafluoroethylene insulation plate.           160°C temperature.




                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                        63                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025240195
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74