Page 184 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 184

Ali and Al-Hasnawi

                (ii)  Water-way network patterns. The dendritic pattern   aquariums, with each aquarium assigned a unique color
                   shows  a network that follows a tree pattern,    and grid code. The legend in the image refers to the grid
                   common in areas with homogeneous geology and     symbols representing basins or sub-regions. Geographic
                   topography.  This  style  promotes  efficient  water   features are also highlighted, with large basins (such as
                   flow. Geometric patterns indicate areas that show   the area in purple or green) representing major basins
                   straight  or angular  patterns,  which may  indicate   with extensive drainage. In contrast, small basins (such
                   geological influences such as faults or rock layers.  as in pink or cyan) represent smaller sub-basins. Several
                (iii) Color representation of ranks. The map uses color   key points can be highlighted  in the watershed basin
                   coding  to  represent  different  stream  ranks.  Pink   map analysis:
                   color (first order) represents the smallest branches   (i)  Definition  of  water  basins.  The  image  contains
                   that form the basis of the drainage network, while   multiple  water  basins  extracted  using  flow
                   colors from green to yellow (ranks 2 – 5) represent   direction and flow accumulation data. The apparent
                   the intermediate  ranks where the sewage pool        boundaries define hydrological breaks, with water
                   begins. Blue to brown colors (ranks 6 – 8) represent   flowing within each basin based on topography.
                   major channels and larger rivers.                (ii)  Distribution of basin sizes. Large basins may
                (iv) Rank distribution. Moving from lower to higher     indicate areas with less steep terrain or areas where
                   ranks shows water accumulation in the landscape,     several small basins are clustered. Small ponds are
                   from highlands to plains. The lower ranks (pink) are   frequently found in areas with local drainage or
                   more evenly distributed, while the higher ranks (blue   steep terrain.
                   and brown) are concentrated in valleys or plains.  (iii) Structural  relationships  between  basins. Based
                (v)  Hydrological insights. These insights can be further   on the picture, there is a gradation in the sizes
                   classified  into  three  parameters.  One  of  these   of the  basins, where  large  basins may  contain
                   parameters  is discharge density, which indicates    several  smaller  sub-basins.  This  structure  can  be
                   that a high density of first-order streams suggests   used in multi-scale  hydrological  studies such as
                   high  discharge.  This  typically  reflects  an  area   flood  management  or  water  resources  planning.
                   with  high  rainfall  rates  or impermeable  surfaces.   Ponds of the  same  color  in  the  picture  represent
                   Second, hydrological connection indicates that       separate  watersheds or sub-basins.  Each  color
                   higher-order sewer connectivity promotes efficient   indicates a unique watershed identified using flow
                   water transport, reducing the risk of local flooding.   accumulation and direction data. These basins are
                   Finally, the map can help identify water basins. The   separated by water dividing lines, meaning all water
                   map can define sub-basin boundaries, with higher-    within the one-colored area flows toward the same
                   order streams defining the primary boundaries.       outlet or meeting point.
                                                                    (iv) Contributions  of watersheds and sub-basins
                4.3.5. The watershed basin map                          to  reservoir  inflow.  The  watershed  delineation
                Figure  16  displays the watershed basin map of the     discovered several sub-basins contributing  to the
                Haditha Dam area. The image illustrates the division of   Haditha Dam reservoir, as shown in  Figure  16.
                                                                        The biggest sub-basin, which makes up about
                                                                        40%  of  the  study  area,  is  a  crucial  hydrological
                                                                        contributor, directing water flow into the reservoir.
                                                                        Major drainage paths are located in the center and
                                                                        southern basin areas, directly feeding the reservoir,
                                                                        according  to  flow  accumulation  studies  shown  in
                                                                        Figure 14.

                                                                    4.3.6. LULC classification
                                                                    The watershed basin map of the Haditha Dam area, which
                                                                    displayed a map of the LULC research area, is shown
                                                                    in Figure 17. This map shows the result of unsupervised
                                                                    classification. There are four basic classes for the study
                Figure 16. The watershed basin map of the Haditha   area, which are: (i) Blue, representing areas containing
                Dam area                                            the  riverbed  and reservoir  of the  Haditha  Dam  area,



                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                       178                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8499
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189