Page 62 - ARNM-2-3
P. 62

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                             NCRT for T3N0M0 ESCC



            + S had an increased risk of death (HR = 10.99; 95%   3.5. Failure patterns in the whole population
            CI = 1.00 – 121.25), while in other subgroups, NCRT   At the final follow-up, the total number of failures
            + S reduced the risk of death (Table 3). Patients with   (comprising local recurrences, distant metastases, and
            tumors located in the lower segment (HR = 1.17; 95%   deaths) was 228/443  (51.5%). The NCRT + S and S
            CI = 0.65 – 2.12), tumor length >5  cm (HR = 1.54;   groups  included  36  and  192  patients,  respectively.  Of
            95% CI = 0.37 – 6.39), or with vascular invasion had   the 103  (103/443, 23.3%) local recurrences, 84 were
            a  significantly  increased risk of  progression  when   intrathoracic local-regional recurrences, 12 were in the
            undergoing NCRT + S (Table 4).
                                                               supraclavicular LNs, and seven were in the intraabdominal
                                                               LNs. The NCRT + S group, with a rate of 14 (14/100), showed
            Table 3. Subgroup analysis related to overall survival in the   a significant reduction in local recurrence compared to the
            overall population
                                                               S group (89/343, 25.9%, P = 0.013). Fifty-two patients had
            Subgroup S   Total  HR (95% CI)  P‑value P‑value for   distant metastases, including 13 with metastasis in the lung,
            versus NCRT+S                         interaction  four in the liver, three in the bone, three in the brain, 24 with
            Age (years)                             0.939      two or more metastatic sites, and five with other metastatic
             ≤65           269  0.58 (0.35 – 0.99)  0.045      locations. No significant differences were observed between
             >65           174  0.59 (0.30 – 1.19)  0.142      the NCRT + S and S groups (11/100 vs. 41/343, P = 0.794).
            Sex                                     0.174      Thirteen patients experienced both local recurrences and
                                                               distant metastases. Thirty-one deaths occurred due to
             Male          360  0.60 (0.39 – 0.92)  0.020      fistulas, hematemesis, hemoptysis, and other non-tumor-
             Female        83  0.19 (0.03 – 1.37)  0.098       related internal medical conditions. Twenty-one patients
            KPS                                     0.181      had unknown reasons for disease progression and cause
             ≥90           376  0.64 (0.41 – 1.01)  0.055      of death; in contrast, eight patients developed a second
             80            67  0.30 (0.09 – 0.98)  0.046       primary tumor. The results are presented in Table 5.
            Weight loss                             0.482
             Yes           170  0.67 (0.32 – 1.40)  0.287      4. Discussion
             No            273  0.51 (0.31 – 0.84)  0.009      This study introduced a novel approach to evaluating
            Tumor location                          0.563      patients with pre-T3N0M0 status and is the first to compare
             Upper         120  0.51 (0.20 – 1.29)  0.154      survival outcomes between NCRT + S and surgery alone in
                                                               this specific group. The results confirmed that NCRT + S
             Middle        218  0.46 (0.20 – 1.05)  0.065      significantly improved OS in patients with pre-T3N0M0
             Lower         105  0.73 (0.38 – 1.40)  0.340      status.
            Tumor length                                0.74
            (cm)                                                 Patients in the NCRT + S group were selected based
             ≤5            354  0.56 (0.36 – 0.87)  0.009      on their pretreatment clinical T stage (cT) rather than
                                                               the post-operative pathological T (pT) stage. Previous
             >5            86  0.85 (0.12 – 6.21)  0.872       studies 4,5,11  have confirmed that NCRT leads to tumor
             Unknown       3  NA (NA – NA)     NA              downstaging, so the post-operative pT staging does not
            LVI                                     0.045      accurately represent the pretreatment T stage in the NCRT
             Yes           24  10.99 (1.00 – 121.25)  0.050    + S group. Since endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and
             No            419  0.54 (0.35 – 0.82)  0.004      CT are widely used in clinical practice, this study utilized cT
            PNI                                     0.719      staging determined through EUS and CT. Both Lightdale
                                                                          19
                                                                                             20
             Yes           86  0.65 (0.25 – 1.65)  0.362       and Kulkarni  and a meta-analysis  reported that the
                                                               accuracy of EUS in diagnosing cT3 tumors in esophageal
             No            357  0.56 (0.35 – 0.90)  0.016      cancer was ≥90%. The accuracy of CT in distinguishing
            Total lymph                             0.435      T3 lesions was 86.7%.  Therefore, the selection of patients
                                                                                21
            nodes excised                                      with cT3 tumors in this study’s NCRT + S group closely
             <18           202  0.43 (0.25 – 0.73)  0.002      represented the actual pretreatment T3 status.
             ≥18           241  0.68 (0.35 – 1.32)  0.257                                                   21
                                                                 Due to the limited accuracy of CT in LN staging,
            Abbreviations: CI: Confidence intervals; HR: Hazard ratio;   clinical N (cN) staging before treatment is often less
            KPS: Karnofsky Performance Status; LVI: Lymphovascular
                                                                                    12
            invasion; NCRT+S: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery;   reliable. A  previous study  reported that approximately
            PNI: Perineural invasion; S: Surgery.              50% of patients with ESCC who underwent surgery alone


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         7                              doi: 10.36922/arnm.3821
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67