Page 83 - ARNM-3-1
P. 83

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                Cone beam-focused GK dosimetric analysis




            Table 1. Physical performance of ZND‑A Smart Knife
            No.         Physical quantity         Item                    Nominal value/requirements
            1    Isocenter deviation                       ≤0.5mm
            2    Nominal dose rate at the focal point  Head  The absorbed dose rate of the biggest radiation-focusing field ≥3.0 Gy/min
                                                           The ratio of absorbed dose rates of the smallest to the biggest
                                                           radiation-focusing fields ≥0.7
                                             Body          The absorbed dose rate of the biggest radiation-focusing field ≥2.0 Gy/min
                                                           The ratio of absorbed dose rates of the smallest to the biggest
                                                           radiation-focusing fields ≥0.6
            3    Nominal radiation field (in diameter)  #1 Collimator   6 mm
                                             #2 Collimator  12 mm
                                             #3 Collimator  25 mm
                                             #4 Collimator  35 mm
            4    Dose gradient               #1 Collimator  ≤6 mm
                                             #2 Collimator  ≤8 mm
                                             #3 Collimator  ≤10 mm
                                             #4 Collimator  ≤10 mm
            5    Comprehensive error in dose calculation  Point dose  ≤5%
                                             Area overlap ratio  ≥90% (biggest radiation field)


                                                               scanned by an EPSON V850 scanner to export 16-bit
                                                               grayscale images. The grayscale-dose values were fitted to
                                                               a second-order polynomial using ImageJ image analysis
                                                               software, resulting in the calibration curve equation:
                                                               y  =  2.1706E −  2  −6x  0.1625x  +  3.03 3E . The grayscale-dose
                                                               calibration curve is shown in Figure 6.
                                                               4.1.4. Focusing field size and dose gradient
            Figure 5. Films irradiated by 1# collimator. XOY and YOZ planes of the
            focusing field in phantom are shown.               EBT3 films were cut to match the same size with the 1#, 2#,
                                                               3#, and 4# collimators, with two films allocated for each
                     
              where  D is the dose rate to water at the focal point on   collimator. For each collimator, one film was irradiated in
                      0
            the installation date; ∆t is the number of years between   the spherical phantom for the XOY plane, while another
            installation date and measurement date; T is the half-life   was irradiated for the YOZ plane. The irradiated films were
                                             1/2
            of radioactive decay (= 5.27 years for Cobalt-60).  then scanned using an EPSON V850 scanner to generate
                                                               16-bit grayscale images at a resolution of 400 dpi. Figure 7
            4.1.3. Film calibration
                                                               displays images of the focusing field irradiated by the 1#, 2#,
            EBT3  is  a  specialized  film  that  undergoes  radiation-  3#, and 4# collimators. These images were analyzed using
            induced crosslinking, causing a color change that reflects   an in-house MATLAB program. The program uses the
            the absorbed dose. Its advantages include no requirement   calibration curve equation to convert the image grayscale
            for chemical development or a darkroom, water resistance,   matrices into dose matrices for further evaluation. The
            cuttability, a wide dose range, and an energy-independent   focusing field size is defined by the 50% isodose curve
            dose response. EBT3 film exhibits varying grayscale levels   area  within  the  radiation  field’s  dose  distribution.  The
            depending on radiation exposure and must be calibrated   dose gradient of the focusing field is characterized by the
            for dose-grayscale correlation before use.         distance between the 20% and 80% isodose curves within
              For  the  film  calibration, EBT3 films were cut  into   the radiation field’s dose distribution.
            small pieces to fit into the film holder in the spherical   4.1.5. TMR-OAR data
            phantom. The films were exposed in the phantom using
            the biggest collimator, with doses ranging from 0 to 1000   The  TMR-OAR  physical  model  is  the  core  component
            cGy in 100 cGy increments. The irradiated films were then   of the TPS. It plays an essential part in calculating


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                         75                             doi: 10.36922/arnm.6280
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88