Page 96 - DP-2-1

Design+ Analysis of 3D-printed anisotropic cells

Conflict of interest 8. Hambali RH, Celik H, Smith P, Rennie A, Ucar M.
Effect of Build Orientation on FDM Parts: A Case Study
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. for Validation of Deformation Behaviour by FEA. In:
Proceedings of IDECON 2010-International Conference on
Author contributions Design and Concurrent Engineering. Melaka: Universiti
Conceptualization: All authors Teknikal Malaysia Melaka; 2010.
Methodology: All authors 9. Liu X, Shapiro V. Homogenization of material properties
Investigation: All authors in additively manufactured structures. Comput Aided Des.
Writing – original draft: All authors 2016;78:71-82.
Writing – review & editing: All authors doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2016.05.017
Ethics approval and consent to participate 10. Villalpando Rosas LF. Characterization of Parametric
Internal Structures for Components Built by Fused Deposition
Not applicable. Modeling. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Canada:
University of Windsor; 2013. p. 224.
Consent for publication
11. Agarwala MK, Jamalabad VR, Langrana NA, Safari A,
Not applicable. Whalen PJ, Danforth SC. Structural quality of parts processed
by fused deposition. Rapid Prototyp J. 1996;2(4):4-19.
Availability of data
doi: 10.1108/13552549610732034
Data are available from the corresponding author upon 12. Anitha R, Arunachalam S, Radhakrishnan P. Critical
reasonable request. parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in
fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol.
References 2001;118(1):385-388.
1. Cunico MWM. Study of Fdm Process Parameter for doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3
Deposition of Fillament in Area with no Support Material.
In: Presented At: 17 European Forum on Rapid Prototyping 13. Bakar NSA, Alkahari MR, Boejang H. Analysis on fused
th
and Manufacturing. Paris; 2012. deposition modelling performance. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A.
2010;11(12):972-977.
2. Cunico MWM. Impressoras 3D: O Novo Meio Produtivo.
Paraná: Concep3d Pesquisas Científicas; 2015. p. 175. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1001365
3. Chen Y, Scarpa F, Liu Y, Leng J. Elasticity of anti-tetrachiral 14. Bertoldi M, Yardimci MA, Pistor CM, GUyeri SI, Sala G.
anisotropic lattices. Int J Solids Struct. 2013;50(6):996-1004. Mechanical Characterization of Parts Processed Via Fused
Deposition. In: Proceedings of the 1998 Solid Freeform
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.004 Fabrication Symposium; 1998.

4. Guessasma S, Belhabib S, Nouri H, Hassana OB. Anisotropic 15. Es-Said OS, Foyos J, Noorani R, Mendelson M, Marloth R,
damage inferred to 3D printed polymers using fused Pregger BA. Effect of layer orientation on mechanical
deposition modelling and subject to severe compression. properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater Manuf
Eur Polym J. 2016;85:324-340. Processes. 2000;15(1):107-122.
doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.030 doi: 10.1080/10426910008912976
5. Ahn S, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright P. Anisotropic 16. Lee B, Abdullah J, Khan Z. Optimization of rapid prototyping
material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. parameters for production of flexible ABS object. J Mater
Rapid Prototyp J. 2002;8(4):248-257. Process Technol. 2005;169(1):54-61.
doi: 10.1108/13552540210441166 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.259
6. Domingo-Espin M, Puigoriol-Forcada JM, Garcia- 17. Montero M, Roundy S, Odell D, Ahn SH, Wright PK.
Granada A-A, Llumà J, Borros S, Reyes G. Mechanical Material Characterization of Fused Deposition Modeling
property characterization and simulation of fused deposition (FDM) ABS by Designed Experiments. In: Proceedings of
modeling Polycarbonate parts. Mater Des. 2015;83:670-677. Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing Conference. United
States: SME; 2001.
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.074
18. Rodríguez JF, Thomas JP, Renaud JE. Mechanical behavior
7. Guessasma S, Belhabib S. What Matters the Most in 3D
Printing is to be Connected: Proof from the Simulation. of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene fused deposition materials
In: Paper Presented at the International Conference on modeling. Rapid Prototyp J. 2003;9(4):219-230.
Computational Methods, Berkeley, USA; 2016. doi: 10.1108/13552540310489604

Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025) 13 doi: 10.36922/dp.3779