Page 95 - DP-2-1
P. 95

Design+                                                               Analysis of 3D-printed anisotropic cells



            simplified model displaying an average Young’s modulus   define and optimize process parameters while maintaining
            approximately 1 GPa higher than the detailed model;   alignment  with  engineering  specifications.  A  notable
            despite this discrepancy, the difference remains minimal.  advantage of this method is that designers, engineering
              The deformation and maximum internal stress of the   designers, and product designers do not need to have
            detailed model were found to be higher than those of the   in-depth knowledge of the manufacturing process.
            simplified model under the same load conditions.   4. Conclusion
              Despite minor differences between the models, their
            equivalence can be demonstrated, with the simplified   In summary, this research demonstrated the anisotropic
            model offering a significant reduction in computational   behavior of FFF specimens through both computational
            time – from about 1 h for the detailed model to just 15 s. In   simulations and experimental tests, successfully validating
            addition, this study examined the use of linear orthotropic   numerical models against experimental data. The study
            stiffness cells based on 3D printing process parameters   identified key and secondary factors influencing anisotropic
            through both experimental and theoretical approaches.  cell behavior, including layer height, filament diameter,
                                                               hexagonal infill diameter, air gap, and line overlap.
              As a result, a simplified model was developed, and
            comparisons among the detailed, simplified, and experimental   It was observed that raster cells exhibit greater resistance
            models showed a strong correlation between them. This   compared to hexagonal and grid cells, primarily due to
            advancement enables the design of complex objects with   the lower density of hexagonal and grid cells. However,
            various anisotropic internal structures and the identification   hexagonal cells were found to have a higher average Young’s
            of process parameters corresponding to these cell properties.   modulus compared to grid and raster cells. Variables such
            This leads to more reliable design specifications compared to   as  layer  height  (for raster  cells),  hexagon  diameter  (for
            current techniques, ensuring an accurate representation of   hexagonal cells), and air gap (for grid cells) were identified
            the mechanical behavior of 3D-printed objects.     as having significant effects on equivalent break stress and
              Thus, the simplified model can be used for designing   elasticity modulus. In addition, the combination of bead
            such objects, reducing computational costs across   width and layer height suggests that larger beads produced
            various environments, including computer-aided design,   stronger objects compared to smaller bead filaments.
            computer-aided engineering, slicers, and computer-aided   The study determined the coefficients  for linear
            manufacturing.                                     orthotropic compliance matrices, leading to a simplified
              The basic design specifications can be divided into two   numerical model with low computational costs. This
            categories: process-based and engineering-based.   research represents an initial framework for integrating

              As illustrated in Figure 11A, the number of parameters   anisotropy characteristics into design specifications
            and the degree of anisotropic strategies can be effectively   despite  manufacturing variations like infill density and
            specified for objects with simple material behavior.   layer height.
            However,  objects  requiring more complex  levels of   Two design specification methods were proposed to
            anisotropy may lead to specifications that are harder to   standardize the mechanical behavior of both complex and
            interpret and visualize.                           simple 3D-printed objects. Nonetheless, many challenges
              This approach integrates the process directly into   remain, and further research is needed to refine the
            the design, ensuring that the final product aligns with   integration of anisotropy in design specification based on
            desired outcomes. Consequently, defining process   process parameters.
            parameters becomes an integral part of design activities.
            This underscores the importance of product engineers,   Acknowledgments
            designers, and engineering designers having a thorough   The authors would like to thank the University of São
            understanding  of  the manufacturing  process  to achieve   Paulo and Zirclab Medical Devices for their support and
            optimal results.                                   infrastructure.
              Another sort of specification is based on engineering
            parameters, where the basic orthotropic coefficients define   Funding
            the material grades, as presented in Figure 11B. In this case,   This research was partially funded by the Brazilian National
            the process parameters are defined during manufacturing   Council for Scientific and Technological Development
            planning using a reference table.                  (CNPQ)  under  the  National  Project  Grant  (Grant  no.:
              This approach empowers manufacturing engineers to   350377/2022 – 7).


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         12                               doi: 10.36922/dp.3779
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100