Page 68 - GHES-1-1
P. 68

Global Health Econ Sustain                                                    Implication of close contact







































            Figure 1. Evolution of the numbers of susceptible (S) (Inset: evolution of θ as a function of time for ω=0.1), exposed (E), asymptomatic (A), and symptomatic
            (I) individuals for different values of the close contacts testing efficiency ω. Abbreviation: a.u: Arbitrary units.

            size while the steady-state infectious flux diminishes. If we   Driessche method (van den Driessche & Watmough,
            introduce births and deaths, the evolution could end in a   2002). It represents the average number of a single infected
            real steady state. Nevertheless, due to the small size of the   individual, symptomatic or asymptomatic, infected at the
            daily infection cases compared to the total population of   beginning of the epidemic. It is worth noting that in our
            a city or country and the not-so-large observation time of   model, R  is independent of θ(t):
                                                                      0
            the steady states, our model can reproduce real evolutions
            in the COVID-19 pandemic.                                 αµ  1− (  p) + βν p
                                                                  R =                                      (7)
                                                                   0
              It is possible to observe that the epidemic will be over     αβ
            sooner for very low ω values (with an inefficient or non-  This independence arises because the terms
            existent contact tracing policy). However, the size of   representing close contact tracing have a second-order
            the epidemic increases by several orders of magnitude.   dependence on the infected population, which makes their
            On  the  other  hand,  if  ω  is  large  enough  (representing   influence negligible during the first stages of the epidemic.
            a more efficient contact tracing policy), the epidemic
            becomes negligible, but it lasts longer. Another fact to   Therefore, the basic reproductive number is not a good
            highlight is that, for the chosen parameters, the number   indicator of the overall evolution of an infection or the
            of asymptomatic individuals is always larger than the   impact of  public  health  measures.  It  only  represents  the
            symptomatic population; but the proportion between these   early stages of the epidemic, when the population is almost
            populations increases after the peak if there is no contact   entirely susceptible.
            tracing. This is because asymptomatic individuals have a   A simpler way to analyze the competition
            larger mean life than symptomatic ones.            between the efficiency of the contact tracing mechanism
                                                               and the infectivity of the disease is to study the evolution
            2.2. Model analysis                                of the total infected population. A better variable to study
            Some mathematical properties can be analytically derived   the model and compare it with real data is the number
            from Equations 1–5. In particular, it is possible to find   of people who tested positive daily,  C(t), that is, the
            the basic reproductive number  R  using the van den   individuals that enter quarantine per day. According to our
                                         0


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2023)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.0873
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73