Page 86 - GPD-2-4
P. 86

Gene & Protein in Disease                                      Gene polymorphism and chronic kidney disease



            a 3-mL peripheral blood sample was obtained from all      Forward: 5’-CAT TGC AAT CCC AAA GAC CCA
            study participants in an EDTA vial. The blood samples   CTC -3’
            were stored at −20℃ in a refrigerator until DNA isolation.      Reverse: 5’-TTG GTT TTG TGG GCA ACA TGA TGG-3’
            Clinical parameters associated with the CCR2 SNP were   The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation
            assessed, including a complete blood count, serum levels of   step at 94℃ for 5 min, followed by 33 cycles of denaturation
            urea, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus,   at 94℃ for 30 s, annealing at 56℃ for 30 s, extension at 72℃
            sodium, potassium, and uric acid. In addition, spot urine   for 30 s, with a final extension at 72℃ for 5 min. Cycling
            samples were collected for microalbumin and creatinine   conditions were standardized on a conventional PCR machine
            analysis.  Radiological  investigations,  such  as  ultrasound,   (T100 Thermal cycler, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc, India).
            were conducted to assess kidney size.
                                                               After successful amplification, the 173-bp PCR products of
            2.2. Sample size                                   the CCR2 gene were subjected to RFLP. RFLP digestion was
                                                               performed in a 20-µL reaction mixture containing 2.5 U of
            The sample size was calculated based on the odds ratio   BseJI (BsaBI) restriction enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
            (OR) of the dominant A allele of  CCR2  in developing   Vilnius, Lithuania) and incubated at 65℃ for 2  h. The
            ESRD in the study population using Equation I :
                                                 [17]
                                                               digested products were examined and visualized using a gel
                       2                                       documentation system (UVP DigiDoc-It Drawer, Analytik
                z  + z  )   1  1 p   −
                                 − p
            n =  ( α  β     1  +   2                  (I)    Jena GmbH + Co. KG, Germany) followed by 3% agarose gel
                   ( −1 e )ln    2    p 1  p 2           electrophoresis. The undigested PCR product with 173 bp
                                                               represented the G allele. The presence of the A allele was
              Where p  = 1/OR (OR = 32.4) and p  = 1.0 (the standard   confirmed by visualizing two fragments of the digested PCR
                                          2
                     1
            OR under the null hypothesis). The clinically considered   product with 149 bp and 24 bp (Figure 1).
            difference in OR under the research hypothesis is e = 0.8.
            The type I error (α) was set at 5%, while the type II error   The 3% agarose gel  picture displays the  PCR-RFLP
            (β) was set at 20%. The power of the study and the loss   product of the  CCR2 gene digested using the BseJI
            to follow-up values were 80% and 10%, respectively.   restriction enzyme. Lanes 1 (L1), 2 (L2), and 4 (L4) depict
            Consequently, the sample size was calculated to be n = 73   the AG genotype corresponding to bands of size 173 and
            in  each  group.  However,  due  to  restrictions  imposed   149 bp; lanes 3 (L3), 6 (L6), 7 (L7), and 8 (L8) indicate the
            during the COVID-19 pandemic, only a sample size of 62   GG genotype corresponding to bands of size 173 bp; lane 5
            in each group was included.                        (L5) indicates a 100-bp ladder.

            2.2.1. DNA Extraction                              2.3. Statistical analysis
            DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using the   The data were analyzed using SPSS software version  23.
            QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according     Demographics, laboratory parameters, and the association
            to the manufacturer’s protocol and stored at -20°C until   of  CCR2  genotype with renal function parameters were
            use. The quality and quantity of DNA were assessed using   evaluated through the Student’s  t-test for continuous
            a 1% agarose gel and a Nanodrop spectrophotometer   variables and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
            (NanoDrop™ 2000/2000c Spectrophotometers, Thermo   Genotype and allele frequencies were compared between
                                                                                                            2
            Fisher Scientific Inc., India).                    the ESRD patients and controls using the Chi-square (χ )
                                                               test. P < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.
            2.2.2. Genotyping
            The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify
            the polymorphic regions, and the restriction fragment
            length polymorphism (RFLP) technique was applied
            to detect the  CCR2  promoter SNP at the positions of
            −190 (G > A) (rs1799864). The PCR reaction was performed
            in a 20-µL reaction volume containing 50 ng genomic DNA,
            10  µL PCR master mix (EmeraldAmp GT PCR Master
            Mix, Takara Bio Inc., India) containing 1 mmol/L MgCl ,
                                                         2
            100  mmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) and
            0.5 U Taq polymerase (G-Biosciences, India), and 10 pmol
            of the following primers (Integrated DNA Technologies,   Figure  1.  Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length
            California, USA):                                  polymorphism image of CCR2 gene (rs1799864) polymorphism.


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023)                         3                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gpd.2253
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91