Page 122 - GTM-4-3
P. 122

Global Translational Medicine                                      Rapid diagnostic imaging on biopsy needle




                         A                                  B












                         C
                                                            D











            Figure 10. Grayscale MUSE and H&E porcine images with resolution analysis. (A) Grayscale porcine MUSE image. Scale bar: 100 µm; magnification: 10×,
            (B) Grayscale porcine H&E image, shown for resolution comparison. Scale bar: 100 µm; magnification: 10×, (C) Intensity profiles across representative
            nuclei of (A); (D) Intensity profiles across representative nuclei of (B).
            Abbreviations: H&E: Hematoxylin and eosin; MUSE: Microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation.

            Table 2. Nuclear intensity measurements from 10×porcine tissue images acquired with MUSE and from H and E brightfield

            Nuclei and imaging modality  Minimum intensity  Maximum intensity  20% from baseline  80% from baseline  Pixel distance
            MUSE 10 × Pig Nucleus 1     86.00           115.00          91.80           109.20         10.0
            MUSE 10 × Pig Nucleus 2     86.50           111.00          91.50           109.20         11.0
            MUSE 10 × Pig Nucleus 3     81.87           112.90          88.08           106.70         8.0
            MUSE 10 × Pig Nucleus 4     97.00           124.09          102.40          118.70         9.0
            MUSE 10 × Pig Nucleus 5     92.97           122.72          98.92           116.80         12.0
            Average MUSE 10 × Pig                                                                      10.0
            H&E 10 × Pig Nucleus 1      145.00          212.40          198.92          158.48         6.0
            H&E 10 × Pig Nucleus 2      91.00           221.20          195.16          117.04         12.0
            H&E 10 × Pig Nucleus 3      97.00           207.00          185.00          119.00         6.0
            H&E 10 × Pig Nucleus 4      115.90          240.00          215.20          140.70         7.0
            H&E 10 × Pig Nucleus 5      128.00          212.00          195.20          144.80         10.0
            Average H and E 10 × Pig                                                                   8.2
            Abbreviations: H&E: Hematoxylin and eosin; MUSE: Microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation.

            the biopsy stayed intact until the compression step in the   to conventional histopathology techniques (Figure 1). The
            imaging process. When an earlier version of CoreView used   images maintain diagnostic integrity, enabling pathologists
            a fluidic lab-on-chip approach without compression, the   to analyze tissue samples effectively without the need for
            removal process recovered only 90% intact CNBs for fresh   traditional histological processing steps.
            breast tissue, necessitating the CoreView ION approach.    Furthermore, image compression was evaluated to
                                                         25
            This efficiency is a key advantage for rapid diagnostic   determine its impact on downstream histopathological
            workflows,  allowing  for near-instantaneous feedback   analysis, including tests with both pig and mouse tissue
            during pathology assessments and CNB procedures. The   samples. Results indicated that compression does not
            prototype’s ability to produce high-quality digital images at   compromise the integrity of downstream histopathological
            low magnification shows its potential as a viable alternative   analysis, and the samples remain viable for pathological


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                        114                          doi: 10.36922/GTM025170039
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127