Page 63 - IJAMD-1-2
P. 63

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design
                                                                             AI-assisted ML monitoring in additive auxetics


            by red circles. These locations are consistent with those   ii.  Advanced DL architecture: To address the high
            predicted by FEM and the DL model. Consequently, the   computational costs associated with evaluating a
            Mnet provides accurate predictions of effective strain   large design space of auxetic structures, an advanced
            fields for diverse auxetic designs, matching well with both   DL architecture, the modified MNet, was employed.
            numerical analysis and experimental observations.     This DL model achieved over 90% accuracy and

              However, certain discrepancies still exist between FEM   demonstrated  evaluation  speed  approximately
                                                                    4
            predictions and ML measurements. Two potential causes   10  times faster than FEA, using a relatively limited
            are hypothesized:                                     dataset of 387 training samples.
                                                               iii.  Experimental validation: The model’s predictions
            i.   Material property  deviation: Specimens fabricated   were validated using  experimental techniques
               through  additive  manufacturing  may  have  limited   incorporating ML-aided non-contact evaluation.
               particle uniformity, whereas FEM assumes perfect   The results showed good agreement, particularly in
               homogeneity, potentially leading to differences in   areas with high-stress concentrations. This validation
               intensity distribution.                            underscores the effectiveness of the data-driven model
            ii.  Precision  of  fabrication:  The  precision  of  the  3D   in accurately predicting strain fields.
               printer may be limited, with DLP-printed specimens   iv.  Comparison with the DIC technique: The ML-based
               exhibiting weakened interlayer adhesion, introducing   structural reliability evaluation technique was
               variation in mechanical properties. FEM analysis, on   calibrated and validated against the DIC technique.
               the other hand, assumes perfect bonding with every   While DIC provides accurate strain field assessments,
               portion of the structure.                          its high cost and complex setup limit its applicability.
              Addressing  these  potential issues could  improve  the   The ML method, through careful mapping between
            agreement between predicted and measured values.      ML intensity and strain fields, demonstrated excellent
              An investigation into the relation between normalized   agreement with DIC measurements, highlighting its
            intensity and structural Poisson’s ratio was conducted for the   potential as a cost-effective SHM technique.
            three designs. The results, shown in Figure S5, indicate that   v.  Practical applicability: The study demonstrates the
            auxetic structures with high NPR exhibit high intensity at   feasibility of simultaneous prediction, fabrication,
            the same global deformation. This trend is due to increased   and direct evaluation of structural reliability in
            rotational deformation within the unit cell in high NPR   various  intricate  structures,  exemplified  by  auxetic
            structures, leading to increased localized strain and thus   metamaterial designs. The proposed ML methodology
            high-intensity values. Given the favored NPR characteristics   shows significant potential for practical applications
            of auxetic structures in design applications, the ML method   requiring high sensitivity to deformation, including
            demonstrates high sensitivity for the designs. Therefore,   aircraft design, pipe monitoring, and sensors.
            future designs of various auxetic structures could benefit   In conclusion, the research provides a robust framework
            from the application of ML methods for real-time   for effective strain prediction and structural reliability
            monitoring and effective verification of structural reliability.  assessment using ML-based methods. The results highlight
                                                               the practicality and efficiency of these techniques in real-
            4. Conclusion                                      world applications, paving the way for advanced SHM
            This study presented a comprehensive framework for   systems that are both cost-effective and highly sensitive to
            predicting the effective strain in auxetic structures, validated   structural deformations.
            through ML-aided non-contact reliability evaluation
            of 3D-printed specimens. The findings underscore the   Acknowledgments
            potential of ML-based structural reliability assessments as   Not applicable.
            cost-effective and deployable solutions for SHM applications,
            particularly for intricate designs such as auxetic structures.  Funding

            The key contributions of the study include:        This work was financially supported by the National
            i.   Unique parametrization with Bézier curves: The use   Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (RS-2023-00222166).
               of Bézier curves for parametrizing auxetic structures   Conflict of interest
               ensured  smooth  surfaces,  efficiently  avoiding  stress
               concentrations  associated  with  sharp  corners.  This   Seunghwa Ryu is an Editorial Board Member of this
               technique enhances the overall structural integrity   journal, but was not in any way involved in the editorial
               and reliability of the designs.                 and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly


            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2024)                         57                             doi: 10.36922/ijamd.3539
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68