Page 52 - IJAMD-1-3
P. 52

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design
                                                                                  Metal AM porosity prediction using ML


              By following these quantitative goals and exploring   Acknowledgements
            new algorithms, we expect to significantly improve the
            performance of the ML models used for porosity prediction   None.
            in AM. These directions not only address the reviewer’s   Funding
            concerns about the vagueness of the original future work
            section but also provide clear, measurable objectives aimed   This publication reflects research supported by a research
            at improving both accuracy and RMSE while considering   grant from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under grant
            practical aspects such as hyperparameter tuning and   number 16/RC/3872, 21/RC/10295_P2, and co-funded by
            computational efficiency.                          the European Regional Development Fund.
            5. Conclusion                                      Conflict of interest
            This study addresses a knowledge gap by developing and   Dermot  Brabazon  is  an  Editorial  Board  Member  of  this
            implementing an  in situ method for porosity prediction   journal and Guest Editor of this special issue, but was not in
            in  additively manufactured  parts.  We approached the   any way involved in the editorial and peer-review process
            problem in two steps: first, classifying each layer as either   conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. Separately,
            low or high porosity, and second, predicting the exact   other authors declared that they have no known competing
            porosity level using two separate regression models.   financial interests or personal relationships that could have
            Herein, the ability of 10 ML models to predict the porosity   influenced the work reported in this paper.
            of NiTi additively manufactured parts was compared
            in terms of RMSE, accuracy, and speed. The dataset was   Author contributions
            collected from the Aconite MINI AM machine which   Conceptualization:  Vivek  Mahato,  Annalina  Caputo,
            consisted of pyrometer data. The porosity of additively   Dermot Brabazon
            manufactured parts was predicted using our experimental   Formal analysis: Vivek Mahato
            findings, highlighting several important conclusions and   Investigation: Vivek Mahato, Annalina Caputo
            suggesting future directions for research. We found that   Methodology:  Vivek  Mahato,  Annalina  Caputo,  Dermot
            pyrometer  data  effectively  captures  relevant  information   Brabazon
            about the underlying AM process, which can be valuable   Writing–original draft: Vivek Mahato
            for analysis, though it requires careful preprocessing to   Writing–review & editing: Suman Chatterjee, Anesu
            reduce noise and clean the data. By using an appropriate   Nyabadza, Annalina Caputo, Dermot Brabazon
            ML model, such as an XT regressor, we achieved strong
            predictive performance for these tasks. Specifically,   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            classifying  a  layer  as  low  (<1%)  or  high  (≥1%)  porosity   Not applicable.
            proved to be a relatively straightforward classification task,
            whereas predicting the exact porosity percentage was more   Consent for publication
            challenging.
                                                               Not applicable.
              In our experiments, the XT regressor achieved an RMSE
            of 0.0367 on the “low” porosity dataset (479 observations)   Availability of data
            but a slightly higher RMSE of 0.108 on the “high” porosity
            dataset (107 observations), which had fewer data points.   Data is available from the corresponding author upon
            When we undersampled the “low” dataset to match the size   reasonable request.
            of the “high” dataset, the model’s performance dropped,   References
            resulting in an RMSE of 0.165. These findings underscore
            the importance of having large and balanced datasets,   1.   Mahato  V,  Obeidi  MA,  Brabazon  D,  Cunningham  P.
            especially for rare occurrences such as high porosity, to   Detecting voids in 3D printing using melt pool time series
            achieve strong performance in regression tasks.       data. J Intell Manuf. 2022;33:842-852.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s10845-020-01694-8
              For additional assessment of the ML algorithms’
            performance in AM, more data on rare occurrences (i.e.,   2.   Herzog T, Brandt M, Trinchi A, Sola A, Molotnikov A.
            high porosity) can be explored in the future. Further   Process monitoring and machine learning for defect
            analyses on the effects of the dataset size and class   detection in laser-based metal additive manufacturing.
            distribution on the performance of the ML models should   J Intell Manuf. 2024;35(4):1407-1437.
            also be examined.                                     doi: 10.1007/s10845-023-02119-y


            Volume 1 Issue 3 (2024)                         46                             doi: 10.36922/ijamd.4812
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57