Page 51 - IJB-1-1

Makoto Nakamura, Tanveer A. Mir, Kenichi Arai, et al.

engineered muscles and muscle-driven organs with 208–209.
physiological and physio-mechanical functions. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1144212.
As for advancements in biofabrication, our method 5. Jakab K, Damon B, Neagu A, et al. 2006, Three-dimen-
of combining bio-patterning and transfer printing of sional tissue constructs built by bioprinting. Biorheology,
pre-patterned cells benefits not only cell printing but 6. vol.43(3-4): 509–513.
Tsang V L and Bhatia S N, 2004, Three-dimensional
also advances tissue printing methods, in which cells tissue fabrication. Advanced drug delivery reviews,
are transferred together with the interactions of vol.56(11): 1635–1647.
cell–cell, cell–matrix, and between microenvironmen- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.05.001.
tal extracellular matrices, while maintaining their 7. Serra P, Duocastella M, Fernández-Pradas J M, et al.
orientations and cell adhesive molecules, thus keeping 2010, Laser-induced forward transfer: a laser-based
their morphological relationships. Bioprinting with technique for biomolecules printing, in Cell and Organ
Printing. Springer, Netherlands, 53–80.
pre-cultured tissues will be essential towards tissue http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9145-1_4.
engineering of hierarchical tissues. Further studies are 8. Ringeisen B R, Othon C M, Wu X J, et al. 2010, Bio-
anticipated to advance methods of biofabrication, a logical laser printing (BioLP) for high resolution cell
relatively new field of tissue engineering. deposition, in Cell and Organ Printing. Springer, Neth-
erlands, 81–94.
Conflict of Interest http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9145-1_5.
9. Guillemot F, Guillotin B, Catros S, et al. 2010,
No conflict of interest was reported by all authors. High-throughput biological laser printing: droplet ejec-
tion mechanism, integration of a dedicated workstation,
Acknowledgments and bioprinting of cells and biomaterials, in Cell and
Organ Printing. Springer, Netherlands, 95–113.
This work was performed to follow-up on the Bio- http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9145-1_6.
printing project of Kanagawa Academy of Science and 10. Chang C C, Boland E D, Williams S K, et al. 2011, Di-
Technology (KAST, 2005.4–2008.3) and was finan- rect-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid sys-
cially supported by grants-in aid for scientific research tems for future regenerative therapies. Journal of Bio-
medical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomate-
(Nos. 17300146, 22300152) from the Japan Society rials, vol.98B(1): 160–170.
for the Promotion of Science. We would like to thank http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31831.
Ms. Izumi Ide for technical examinations. We would 11. Guillemot F, Mironov V and Nakamura M, 2010, Bio-
also like to thank MicroJet Corporation for their ex- printing is coming of age: report from the International
cellent advices and experimental support with regards Conference on Bioprinting and Biofabrication in Bor-
to inkjet technology, and Yokogawa Electrics Corpo- deaux (3B'09). Biofabrication, vol.2(1): 010201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/010201.
ration and Nikon Corporation for helping to obtain 12. Bajaj P, Schweller R M, Khademhosseini A, et al. 2014,
beautiful confocal images. 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and
regenerative medicine. Annual Reviews of Biomedical
References Engineering, vol.16: 247–276.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155.
1. Wilson W C Jr and Boland T. 2003, Cell and organ 13. Collins S F, 2014, Bioprinting is changing regenerative
printing 1: protein and cell printers. The Anatomical medicine forever. Stem Cells and Development,
Record Part A: discoveries in molecular, cellular, and vol.23(Sl): 79–82.
evolutionary biology, vol.272A(2): 491–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/scd.2014.0322.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.10057. 14. Ozbolat I T and Yu Y, 2013, Bioprinting toward organ
2. Boland T, Mironov V, Gutowska A, et al. 2003, Cell and fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Transac-
organ printing 2: fusion of cell aggregates in tions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.60(3): 691–699.
three-dimensional gels. The Anatomical Record Part A: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912.
discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary bi- 15. Kobayashi A, Miyake H, Hattori H, et al. 2007, In vitro
ology, vol.272A(2): 497–502. formation of capillary networks using optical litho-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.10059. graphic techniques. Biochemical and Biophysical Re-
3. Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, et al. 2003, Organ print- search Communications, vol.358(3): 692–697.
ing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.206.
Trends in Biotechnology, vol.21(4): 157–161. 16. Yoshida T, Komaki M, Hattori H, et al. 2010, Therapeu-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7. tic angiogenesis by implantation of a capillary structure
4. Calvert P, 2007, Printing cells, Science, vol.318: constituted of human adipose tissue microvascular en-

International Journal of Bioprinting (2015)–Volume 1, Issue 1 47