Page 105 - IJB-10-1
P. 105

International Journal of Bioprinting                                3D bioprinting for musculoskeletal system




            tissue constructs, including ears and muscles, were   Author contributions
            successfully formed without surgical exposure. Taking   Conceptualization: Qiang Wei, Yuhao Peng, Bin Li
            a similar principle, Urciuolo  et al. developed a new   Data curation: Qiang Wei, Yuhao Peng, Weicheng Chen,
            bioprinting technique, which enables direct fabrication   Yudong Duan, Genglei Chu, Shujun Lyu
            of  functional  tissues  in  living  animals,  and  named  it   Supervision: Fengxuan Han, Bin Li
                                  139
            intravital 3D bioprinting.  The technique allows  in   Visualization: Yuhao Peng, Zhigang Chen, Weicheng
            situ bioprinting of a variety of complex tissue constructs   Chen, Yudong Duan, Jie Hu
            such as dermis, skeletal muscle and brain.
                                                               Writing – original draft: Qiang Wei
               When it comes to disease modeling, 3D bioprinting is   Writing – review & editing:  Qiang Wei, Fengxuan Han,
            a powerful tool and has been employed to create complex   Bin Li
            and dynamic models of various types of tumors.  The
                                                     196
            emergence of bioprinted models has enhanced our    Ethics approval and consent to participate
            understanding of the onset and progression of disease.   Not applicable.
            They also provide a valuable platform for the screening
            and development of therapeutic drug for MSDs.      Consent for publication
            However, the development of 3D bioprinting for creating
            musculoskeletal disease models is still in its infancy, and   Not applicable.
            the number of relevant studies available for review is
            limited. Most existing studies utilized simplified bioprinted   Availability of data
            models to screen high-throughput drugs or answer simple   Not applicable.
            research questions. The future of bioprinting models for
            personalized therapy of MSDs may lie in the creation of   References
            more biomimetic in vitro disease models.
                                                               1.   Khodabukus A, Guyer T, Moore AC, Stevens MM, Guldberg
            6. Conclusion                                         RE, Bursac N. Translating musculoskeletal bioengineering
                                                                  into tissue regeneration therapies.  Sci Transl Med.
            Due to its powerful ability to instantly and accurately transform   2022;14:eabn9074.
            digital images into 3D entities with biological function, 3D      doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abn9074
            bioprinting offers an advanced method for the construction   2.   Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S,
            of complex tissue constructs as well as drug development.   Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based
            Bioprinted tissue constructs have shown promising     on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: A systematic
            performance in the studies concerning the regeneration of   analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
            musculoskeletal  tissues,  including  bone,  cartilage,  skeletal   Lancet. 2021;396:2006-2017.
            muscle, and meniscus. Aided by the development of newly      doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32340-0
            synthesized materials and novel bioprinting technologies,   3.   Zhang S, Xing M, Li B. Recent advances in musculoskeletal
            the application of 3D bioprinting for musculoskeletal tissue   local drug delivery. Acta Biomater. 2019;93:135-151.
            engineering will be significantly expanded in the future.     doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.043

            Acknowledgments                                    4.   Agarwal R, Williams K,  Umscheid CA,  Welch WC.
                                                                  Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes for lumbar
            None.                                                 fusion: A systematic review.  J Neurosurg Spine.  2009;11:
                                                                  729-740.
            Funding                                               doi: 10.3171/2009.6.Spine08669
                                                               5.   Charalambides C, Beer M, Cobb AG. Poor results after
            This work was funded by the National Natural Science   augmenting autograft with xenograft (Surgibone) in hip
            Foundation of China (81925027, 32130059, 32171350), the   revision surgery: A report of 27 cases. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:
            Medical and Health Science and Technology Innovation   544-549.
            Project  of  Suzhou  (SKY2022105),  and  the  Priority      doi: 10.1080/17453670510041547
            Academic  Program  Development  of  Jiangsu  Higher   6.   Shapira A, Dvir T. 3D tissue and organ printing—Hope and
            Education Institutions.                               reality. Adv Sci. 2021;8:2003751.
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/advs.202003751
            Conflict of interest
                                                               7.   Vanderburgh J, Sterling  JA,  Guelcher SA. 3D  printing
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         of tissue engineered constructs for in vitro modeling of


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                        97                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1037
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110