Page 127 - IJB-10-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Droplet-based bioprinting of tumor spheroids

of microfluidics into a droplet-based bioprinting platform, Availability of data
other measurement modalities can be utilized to enable Not applicable.
detection and sorting during bioprinting. This integration
can empower conventional droplet-based bioprinting with References
new capabilities, such as deterministic printing of single
cells. Indeed, cell sorting is one powerful strategy to avoid 1. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, et al. Cancer statistics in China and
the drawback of random loading in conventional methods. United States, 2022: Profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin
In addition, with the rapid development of image-free Med J (Engl). 2022;135(5):584-590.
detection methods based on AI, intelligent bioprinting doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108
106
without labeling may be enabled. 2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics,
The applications of spheroids are very limited, although 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33.
they are widely used in cancer research and preclinical doi: 10.3322/caac.21708
testing of anti-cancer drugs. Besides, simplified ECM is 3. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer
unable to precisely mimic the TME, thus hindering the statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021;
detailed study of tumor pathological behavior. Besides, 149(4):778-789.
avascular spheroids have a limited lifespan and cannot doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588
survive for a long time. Therefore, it is essential to induce 4. Zugazagoitia J, Guedes C, Ponce S, Ferrer I, Molina-Pinelo
the formation of vessels inside spheroids to obtain S, Paz-Ares L. Current challenges in cancer treatment. Clin
vascularized spheroids, which are the building block of Ther. 2016;38(7):1551-1566.
large-scale biological tissues. Finally, most methods can doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.026
107
only detect tumor growth and drug response in single 5. Zhuang P, Chiang YH, Fernanda MS, He M. Using spheroids
mode, which increases the probability of neglecting certain as building blocks towards 3D bioprinting of tumor
key features and reduces the test accuracy. Thus, screening microenvironment. Int J Bioprint. 2021;7(4):1-26.
a set of molecular markers and continuous imaging may doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i4.444
be applied, for long-term monitoring purposes, to assess 6. Jo Y, Choi N, Kim K, Koo H-J, Choi J, Kim HN.
the internal growth status of tumor tissues and record the Chemoresistance of cancer cells: Requirements of tumor
external morphology, respectively. 108,109 microenvironment-mimicking in vitro models in anti-
cancer drug development. Theranostics. 2018;8(19):5259-
Acknowledgments 5275.
doi: 10.7150/thno.29098
None.
7. Chramiec A, 2022; A novel human multi-tissue system for
preclinical drug evaluation and recapitulation of metastasis,
Funding thesis, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Columbia
This work was supported by the National Natural Science University, 28963406.
Foundation of China (Grant Number 52205296) and National 8. Dhiman HK, Ray AR,Panda AK. Three-dimensional
Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (Overseas). chitosan scaffold-based MCF-7 cell culture for the
determination of the cytotoxicity of tamoxifen. Biomaterials.
Conflict of interest 2005;26(9):979-986.
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.012
The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
9. Imamura Y, Mukohara T, Shimono Y, et al. Comparison of
Author contributions 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in
breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2015; 33(4):1837-1843.
Conceptualization: Pengfei Zhang doi: 10.3892/or.2015.3767
Writing – original draft: Congying Liu, Yuhe Chen 10. Hoarau-Vechot J, Rafii A, Touboul C, Pasquier J. Halfway
Writing – review & editing: Huawei Chen, Pengfei Zhang between 2D and animal models: Are 3D cultures the ideal
tool to study cancer-microenvironment interactions?
Ethics approval and consent to participate Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(1):181.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19010181
Not applicable.
11. Kapalczynska M, Kolenda T, Przybyla W, et al. 2D and 3D
Consent for publication cell cultures - a comparison of different types of cancer cell
cultures. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(4):910-919.
Not applicable. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.63743

Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024) 119 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1214