Page 298 - IJB-10-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Scaffolds manufacturing by fused deposition modeling

14. Billström GH, Blom AW, Larsson S, Beswick AD. Application 26. Yang TC. Effect of extrusion temperature on the physico-
of scaffolds for bone regeneration strategies: Current trends mechanical properties of unidirectional wood fiber-
and future directions. Injury. 2013;44(suppl.1):S28-S33. reinforced polylactic acid composite (WFRPC) components
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70007-X using fused depositionmodeling. Polymers. 2018;10(9):1-11.
doi: 10.3390/polym10090976
15. Betz MW, Yeatts AB, Richbourg WJ, et al. Macroporous
hydrogels upregulate osteogenic signal expression 27. Ang SL, Sivashankari R, Shaharuddin B, et al. Potential
and promote bone regeneration. Biomacromolecules. applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates as a biomaterial for
2010;11(5):1160-1168. the aging population. Polym Degrad Stab. 2020;181(1):1-18.
doi: 10.1021/bm100061z doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109371
16. Webster TJ, Ahn ES. Nanostructured biomaterials for 28. Asghari F, Samiei M, Adibkia K, Akbarzadeh A, Davaran
tissue engineering bone. Adv Biochem Eng/Biotechnol. S. Biodegradable and biocompatible polymers for tissue
2006;103(1):275-308. engineering application: A review. Artif Cells Nanomed
doi: 10.1007/10_021 Biotechnol. 2017;45(2):185-192.
doi: 10.3109/21691401.2016.1146731
17. Javaid M, Haleem A. 3D printing applications towards the
required challenge of stem cells printing. Clin Epidemiol 29. Mehrpouya M, Vahabi H, Barletta M, et al. Additive
Global Health. 2020;8(3):862-867. manufacturing of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs)
doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2020.02.014 biopolymers: Materials, printing techniques, and
applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;127(1):1-13.
18. Strong D, Sirichakwal I, Manogharan GP, Wakefield T.
Current state and potential of additive: Hybrid manufacturing doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112216
for metal parts. Rapid Prototyp J. 2017;23(3):577-588. 30. Ferrer I, Manresa A, Méndez JA, Delgado-Aguilar M,
doi: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0065 Garcia-Romeu ML. Manufacturing PLA/PCL blends by
ultrasonic molding technology. Polymers. 2021;13(15):1-17.
19. Spierings AB, Starr TL, Wegener K. Fatigue performance doi: 10.3390/polym13152412
of additive manufactured metallic parts. Rapid Prototyp J.
2013;19(2):88-94. 31. Wu CS. Characterization, functionality and application of
doi: 10.1108/13552541311302932 siliceous sponge spicules additive-based manufacturing
biopolymer composites. Addit Manuf. 2018;22(1):13-20.
20. Song J, Gao H, Zhu G, Cao X, Shi X, Wang Y. The preparation doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.034
and characterization of polycaprolactone/graphene oxide
biocomposite nanofiber scaffolds and their application for 32. Rebia RA, Rozet S, Tamada Y, Tanaka T. Biodegradable
directing cell behaviors. Carbon. 2015;95(1):1039-1050. PHBH/PVA blend nanofibers: Fabrication, characterization,
doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.011 in vitro degradation, and in vitro biocompatibility. Polym
Degrad Stab. 2018;154(1):124-136.
21. Nazeer MA, Onder OC, Sevgili I, Yilgor E, Kavakli IH, doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.05.018
Yilgor Iskender. 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds
modified with chitosan and hydroxyapatite for bone repair 33. Washington MA, Balmert SC, Fedorchak MV, Little SR,
applications. Mater Today Commun. 2020;25(1):1-9. Watkins SC, Meyer TY. Monomer sequence in PLGA
doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101515 microparticles: Effects on acidic microclimates and in vivo
inflammatory response. Acta Biomater. 2018;65(1):259-271.
22. Kattimani VS, Kondaka S, Lingamaneni KP. Hydroxyapatite: doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.043
Past, present, and future in bone regeneration. Bone Tissue
Regen Insights. 2016;7(1):BTRI.S36138. 34. Lim J, You M, Li J, Li Z. Emerging bone tissue engineering
doi: 10.4137/btri.S36138 via polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)-based scaffolds. Mater Sci
Eng C. 2017;79(1):917-929.
23. Kim CG, Han KS, Lee S, Kim MC, Kim SY, Nah J. Fabrication doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.132
of biocompatible polycaprolactone–hydroxyapatite
composite filaments for the FDM 3D printing of bone 35. dos Santos AJ, Oliveira Dalla Valentina LV, Hidalgo Schulz AA,
scaffolds. Appl Sci (Switzerland). 2021;11(14):1-9. Tomaz MA. From obtaining to degradation of PHB: Material
doi: 10.3390/app11146351 properties. Part I. Ingeniería y ciencia. 2017;13(26):269-298.
24. Fierz FC, Beckmann F, Huser M, et al. The morphology 36. Ramot Y, Haim-Zada M, Domb AJ, Nyska A. Biocompatibility
of anisotropic 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds. and safety of PLA and its copolymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev.
Biomaterials. 2008;29(28):3799-3806. 2016;107(1):153-162.
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.012 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.012
25. Esposito Corcione C, Gervaso F, Scalera F, et al. Highly 37. Qu XH, Wu Q, Zhang KY, Chen GQ. In vivo studies of
loaded hydroxyapatite microsphere/PLA porous scaffolds poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) based
obtained by fused deposition modelling. Ceram Int. polymers: Biodegradation and tissue reactions. Biomaterials.
2019;45(2, Part B):2803-2810. 2006;27(19):3540-3548.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.297 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.015

Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024) 290 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0156