Page 297 - IJB-10-1
P. 297

International Journal of Bioprinting                       Scaffolds manufacturing by fused deposition modeling




            Acknowledgments                                    2.   Mohan N, Senthil P, Vinodh S, Jayanth N. A review on
                                                                  composite materials and process parameters optimisation
            Juan Ivorra-Martinez wants to thank for the FPU19/01759   for the fused deposition modelling process.  Virtual Phys
            grant funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and,   Prototyp. 2017;12(1):47-59.
            as appropriate, by ESF Investing in Your Future. Funding for      doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490
            open-access charge is provided by Universitat Politècnica de   3.   Martín-Montal J, Pernas-Sánchez J, Varas D. Experimental
            València (UPV). Marc Delgado-Aguilar is a Serra Húnter   characterization framework for SLA additive manufacturing
            Fellow. Microscopy Services at UPV are also acknowledged   materials. Polymers. 2021;13(7):1-16.
            for their help in collecting and analyzing images.     doi: 10.3390/polym13071147
            Funding                                            4.   Lima AL, Pires FQ, Hilgert LA, Sá-Barreto LL. Oscillatory
                                                                  shear rheology as an in-process control tool for 3D printing
            This work is supported by the grant PID2020-116496RB-C22   medicines production by fused deposition modeling.
            funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and          J Manuf Process. 2022;76(1):850-862.
            the grant TED2021-131762A-I00 funded by MCIN/         doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.001
            AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European      5.   Tarrés Q, Melbø JK, Delgado-Aguilar M, Espinach FX,
            Union. Authors also thank Generalitat Valenciana-GVA   Mutjé P, Chinga-Carrasco G. Bio-polyethylene reinforced
            for funding this research through the grant numbers   with thermomechanical pulp fibers: Mechanical and
            AICO/2021/025 and CIGE/2021/094. This study is also   micromechanical characterization and its application in
            funded by Aid for First Research Projects (PAID-06-22),   3D-printing by fused deposition modelling. Compos B Eng.
            Vice-rectorate for Research of the Universitat Politècnica   2018;153(1):70-77.
            de València (UPV).                                    doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.009
                                                               6.   Domínguez-Robles J, Utomo E, Cornelius VA, et al. TPU-
            Conflict of interest                                  based antiplatelet cardiovascular prostheses prepared using
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         fused deposition modelling. Mater Design. 2022;220(1):1-18.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110837
            Author contributions                               7.   Prasad LK, Smyth H. 3D printing technologies for drug delivery:
                                                                  A review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(7):1019-1031.
            Conceptualization: Ines Ferrer, Maria Luisa Garcia-Romeu     doi: 10.3109/03639045.2015.1120743
            Formal analysis: Juan Ivorra-Martinez
            Fund acquisition: Marc Delgado-Aguilar, Roberto Aguado  8.   Roopavath UK, Kalaskar DM. Introduction to 3D printing
            Project administration: Ines Ferrer, Maria Luisa Garcia-  in medicine, In: 3D Printing in Medicine. 2017;Elsevier Inc.,
               Romeu                                              1-20.
            Visualization: Juan Ivorra-Martinez                9.   Yan Q, Dong H, Su J, et al. A review of 3D printing
            Writing – original draft: Juan Ivorra-Martinez        technology for medical applications. Engineering. 2018;4(5):
            Writing – review & editing: Juan Ivorra-Martinez, Marc   729-742.
               Delgado-Aguilar, Teodomiro Boronat                 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.021
                                                               10.  Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers:
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            Challenges among expanding options and opportunities.
            None.                                                 Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):54-64.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018
            Consent for publication                            11.  Chen X, Gao C, Jiang J, Wu Y, Zhu P, Chen G. 3D printed
                                                                  porous PLA/nHA composite scaffolds with enhanced
            None.
                                                                  osteogenesis and osteoconductivity in vivo for bone
            Availability of data                                  regeneration. Biomed Mater (Bristol). 2019;14(6):1-15.
                                                                  doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab388d
            Data will be made available on request.            12.  Dwivedi R, Kumar S, Pandey R, et al. Polycaprolactone as
            References                                            biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature. J Oral
                                                                  Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10(1):381-388.
            1.   Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui      doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003
               D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of   13.  Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, D. Kumar S.
               materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos B   Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review.
               Eng. 2018;143(1): 172-196.                         Int J Polym Sci. 2011;2011(1):1-19.
               doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012             doi: 10.1155/2011/290602


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       289                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0156
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302