Page 344 - IJB-10-1

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed bone scaffolds and biofilm formation

Funding 6. Deng F, Liu L, Li Z, Liu J. 3D printed Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds
with different pore structure effects on bone ingrowth. J Bio
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship Eng. 2021;15(1):4.
for Research & Innovation, “Ministry of Education” in doi: 10.1186/s13036-021-00255-8
Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the 7. Qin Y, Wang Q, Shi C, et al. Structural design and performance
project number (IFKSUDR_P102). study of primitive triply periodic minimal surfaces Ti6Al4V
biomimetic scaffold. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12759.
Conflict of interest doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17066-6

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. 8. Asbai-Ghoudan R, Ruiz de Galarreta S, Rodriguez-Florez N.
Analytical model for the prediction of permeability of triply
Author contributions periodic minimal surfaces. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
2021;124:104804.
Conceptualization: Abdulsalam A. Al-Tamimi doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104804
Formal analysis: Abdulsalam A. Al-Tamimi, Esraa 9. Lvov VA, Senatov FS, Veveris AA, Skrybykina VA, Díaz
Aldawood Lantada A. Auxetic metamaterials for biomedical devices:
Investigation: Abdulsalam A. Al-Tamimi, Esraa Aldawood current situation, main challenges, and research trends.
Methodology: Abdulsalam A. Al-Tamimi, Esraa Aldawood Materials (Basel). 2022;15(4):1439.
Writing – original draft: Abdulsalam A. Al-Tamimi 10. Mardling P, Alderson A, Jordan-Mahy N, Le Maitre CL. The
Writing – review & editing: Abdulsalam A. Al-Tamimi, use of auxetic materials in tissue engineering. Biomater Sci.
Esraa Aldawood 2020;8(8):2074-2083.
doi: 10.1039/C9BM01928F
Ethics approval and consent to participate
11. Choi HJ, Lee JJ, Park YJ, et al. MG-63 osteoblast-like cell
Not applicable. proliferation on auxetic PLGA scaffold with mechanical
stimulation for bone tissue regeneration. Biomater Res.
Consent for publication 2016;20:33.
doi: 10.1186/s40824-016-0080-4
Not applicable.
12. Park YJ, Kim JK. The effect of negative Poisson’s ratio
Availability of data polyurethane scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering
applications. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2013;2013:853289.
Data is available from corresponding author at reasonable doi: 10.1155/2013/853289
request. 13. Rahmani R, Antonov M, Kollo L, Holovenko Y, Prashanth
KG. Mechanical behavior of Ti6Al4V scaffolds filled with
References CaSiO3 for implant applications. App Sci. 2019;9(18):3844.
doi: 10.3390/app9183844
1. Al-Tamimi A, Fernandes PRA, Peach C, et al. Metallic bone 14. Callens SJP, Uyttendaele RJC, Fratila-Apachitei LE, Zadpoor
fixation implants: A novel design approach for reducing AA. Substrate curvature as a cue to guide spatiotemporal cell
the stress shielding phenomenon. Virtual Phys Prototyp. and tissue organization. Biomater. 2020;232:119739.
2017;12(2):141-151. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119739
doi: 10.1080/17452759.2017.1307769
15. Zheng X, Guo X, Watanabe I. A mathematically defined
2. Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ. Understanding the effect of mean 3D auxetic metamaterial with tunable mechanical and
pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan conduction properties. Mater Des. 2021;198:109313.
scaffolds. Cell Adh Migr. 2010;4(3):377-381. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109313
doi: 10.4161/cam.4.3.11747
16. Veerabagu U, Palza H, Quero F. Review: Auxetic polymer-
3. iHealthcareAnalyst I. Global bone fracture repair devices based mechanical metamaterials for biomedical applications.
market $22.3 billion by 2029. November 27, 2023. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(7):2798-2824.
https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/global-bone-fracture- doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00109
repair-devices-market/
17. Cheng A, Schwartz Z, Kahn A, et al. Advances in porous
4. Hutmacher DW, Tandon B, Dalton PD. Scaffold design and scaffold design for bone and cartilage tissue engineering and
fabrication. In: De Boer J, Blitterswijk CAV, Uquillas JA, regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2018;25(1):14-29.
Malik N, eds. Tissue Engineering (Third Edition). Academic doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0119
Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 2023:355-385.
18. Eltom A, Zhong G, Muhammad A. Scaffold techniques
5. Zadpoor AA. Meta-biomaterials. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(1):18-38. and designs in tissue engineering functions and purposes:
doi: 10.1039/C9BM01247H A review. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2019;2019:3429527.

Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024) 336 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1768