Page 431 - IJB-10-1
P. 431

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Mechanically biomimicking 3D bone model





































                    Figure 4. Cross-sectional images of specimens with different infill design parameters of D , D , and vol . The scale bar is 5 mm.
                                                                             H  S     S

            by controlling the infill density of the surficial hard region,   those  of specimen (i). Finally, this is  equivalent  to the
            the stiffness can be varied while keeping the failure load   tuned mechanical properties with the increased stiffness
            constant. Next, the compressive properties of specimens   and the decreased failure load.
            (iv), (v), and (vi) showed with increased vol  and decreased   Collectively, the experimental results  in  Figure  5
                                              S
            failure load, while the stiffness remained constant   demonstrate the achieved tunability in mechanical
            (Figure 5B). This was because the increase in the soft part   properties of stiffness and failure load through the infill
            caused the decrease in crushing resistance and failure load   density variation. This independent tunability of stiffness
            of the overall structure after the initial-state deformation   and strength is theoretically supported by Reuss and Voigt
            of the surficial hard part, as discussed in the previous   material models.  These models have been used to explain
                                                                            41
            section. Since the hard part had the same infill design   the behavior of composite materials containing two
            parameter, the  initial deformation  behavior  was almost   different soft and hard components, in which their stiffness
            identical even up to a compression displacement of 4 mm.   and strength can be adjusted independently to a certain
            This implies that controlling the volume ratio of the soft   extent. Our experimental results align with this theoretical
            part can vary the failure load while keeping the stiffness   concept and support the rationale of effectiveness in
            constant. Comparing the specimens (iii) and (iv), we   emulating bone-like mechanical properties.
            observed that both the failure load and stiffness decreased
            as D  decreased (Figure 5C). This was because the initial-  3.4. Bone model mimicking compressive behavior of
               S
            state deformation mostly occurred in the  surficial hard   human vertebra
            part, but the decreased infill density of the central soft part   For bone mechanics, simulation and experiment results
            also influenced the initial deformation to an extent. These   showed that the vertebral body was progressively deformed
            three structural parameters of the infill design discussed   during compression by the deflection of the endplate,
            above could be used individually to control stiffness or   buckling  of  the  cortical shell, and  densification  of  the
            failure load, or in combination to achieve a specific target   trabecular bone. 42,43  Thus, for the bone model to mimic the
            for both properties. As shown in Figure 5D, by controlling   mechanical behavior and the shape of natural vertebrae,
            both D  and D  sequentially, the properties corresponding   the infill-varied structure was designed to correspond to the
                       H
                 S
            to specimen (v) were first adjusted to the properties of   hard region (cortical bone), soft region (cancellous bone),
            (iii) by the adjustment of D . Subsequently, by further   and contour (cortical shell). The mechanical properties of
                                    S
            adjustment  of D , the  properties  were tuned to match   human bone vary based on the anatomical site, age, and
                          H
            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       423                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1067
   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436