Page 73 - IJB-10-1
        P. 73
     International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting
            Writing – review & editing: Federico Serpe, Chiara   10.  Iafrate L, Benedetti MC, Donsante S, et al.  Modelling
               Scognamiglio, Gianluca  Cidonio, Carlo Massimo     skeletal pain harnessing tissue engineering.  Vitr Model.
               Casciola, Giancarlo Ruocco                         2022;1(4-5):289-307.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s44164-022-00028-7
            Ethics approval and consent to participate         11.  Marcotulli  M, Tirelli  MC, Volpi M,  Jaroszewicz J.
                                                                  Microfluidic  3D  printing  of  emulsion  ink  for  engineering
            Not applicable.                                       porous functionally graded materials.  Adv Mater Technol.
                                                                  2022;2201244:1-12.
            Consent for publication                               doi: 10.1002/admt.202201244
            Not applicable.                                    12.  Davoodi E, Sarikhani E, Montazerian H, et al.  Extrusion
                                                                  and microfluidic-based bioprinting to fabricate biomimetic
                                                                  tissues and organs.  Adv Mater Technol.  2020;5(8):
            Availability of data                                  1901044.
            Not applicable.                                       doi: 10.1002/admt.201901044
                                                               13.  Sackmann EK, Fulton AL, Beebe DJ. The present and
            References                                            future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature.
                                                                  2014;507(7491):181-189.
            1.   Whitesides GM. The origins and the future of microfluidics.      doi: 10.1038/nature13118
               Nature. 2006;442(7101):368-373.                 14.  Chen L, Yang C, Xiao Y, et al. Millifluidics, microfluidics,
               doi: 10.1038/nature05058                           and  nanofluidics:  manipulating  fluids  at  varying  length
            2.   Convery N, Gadegaard N. 30 Years of microfluidics. Micro   scales. Mater Today Nano. 2021;16:100136.
               Nano Eng. 2019;2(November 2018):76-91.             doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100136
               doi: 10.1016/j.mne.2019.01.003                  15.  Bezrukov AN, Galyametdinov YG. Evaluation of diffusion
                                                                  coefficients of small ions in a microfluidic channel.
            3.   Guimarães CF, Gasperini L, Marques AP, Reis RL.  3D   2021;85(8):889-893.
               flow-focusing microfluidic biofabrication: One-chip-     doi: 10.3103/S1062873821080049
               fits-all hydrogel fiber architectures.  Appl  Mater  Today.
               2021;23:101013.                                 16.  Böke JS, Kraus D, Henkel T. Microfluidic network
               doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101013                    simulations enable on-demand prediction of control
                                                                  parameters for  operating  lab-on-a-chip-devices.  Processes.
            4.   Abrishamkar  A,  Nilghaz  A,  Saadatmand  M,  Naeimirad   2021;9(8):1320.
               M, deMello AJ. Microfluidic-assisted fiber production:      doi: 10.3390/pr9081320
               Potentials, limitations,  and  prospects.  Biomicrofluidics.   17.  Qin D, Xia Y, Rogers JA, Jackman RJ, Zhao X-M, Whitesides
               2022;16(6):1-32.                                   GM. Microfabrication, microstructures and microsystems.
               doi: 10.1063/5.0129108
                                                                  In: Manz A, Becker H, eds.  Microsystem Technology in
            5.   Pati F, Gantelius J, Svahn HA. 3D bioprinting of tissue/organ   Chemistry and Life Sciences. 1998;Vol 194 Springer-Verlag.
               models. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 2016;55(15):4650-4665.  1-20.
               doi: 10.1002/anie.201505062                        doi: 10.1007/3-540-69544-3_1
            6.   van der Heide D, Cidonio G, Stoddart MJ, D'Este M. 3D   18.  Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography. Angew Chemie - Int
               printing of inorganic-biopolymer composites for bone   Ed. 1998;37(5):550-575.
               regeneration. Biofabrication. 2022;14(4):042003.   doi:  10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19980316)37:5<550::aid-
               doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac8cb2                      anie550>3.3.co;2-7
                                                               19.  O’Neill PF, Ben Azouz A, Vázquez M, et al. Advances in three-
            7.   Scognamiglio  C,  Soloperto  A,  Ruocco  G,  Cidonio  G.   dimensional rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices for
               Bioprinting stem cells: Building physiological tissues one cell   biological applications. Biomicrofluidics. 2014;8(5):052112.
               at a time. Am J Physiol - Cell Physiol. 2020;319(3):C465-C480.     doi: 10.1063/1.4898632
               doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00124.2020
                                                               20.  Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM. Soft lithography for
            8.   Cidonio G, Glinka M, Kim Y-H, Dawson JI, Oreffo ROC.   micro- and nanoscale patterning.  Nat Protoc.  2010;5(3):
               Nanocomposite clay-based bioinks for skeletal tissue   491-502.
               engineering. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2147:63-72.     doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.234
               doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0611-7_6
                                                               21.  Bhattacharjee N, Urrios A, Kang S, Folch A. The upcoming
            9.   Memic A, Navaei A, Mirani B, et al. Bioprinting technologies   3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.  Lab Chip.
               for disease modeling. Biotechnol Lett. 2017;39(9):1279-1290.  2016;16(10):1720-1742.
               doi: 10.1007/s10529-017-2360-z                     doi: 10.1039/c6lc00163g
            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                        65                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1404
     	
