Page 59 - IJB-2-2

Huijun Li, Sijun Liu and Lin Li

its low ability of viscosity recovery, the viscosity re- 9. Song S J, Choi J, Park Y D, et al., 2010, A three-dimen-
covery of alginate hydrogel could be improved by sional bioprinting system for use with a hydrogel-based
adding up a small amount of graphene oxide. Some biomaterial and printing parameter characterization. Ar-
measureable parameters have been defined to describe tificial Organs, vol.34(11): 1044–1048.
and discuss the quality of 3D printing. The present http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01143.x
study provides a new approach to the analysis of 3D 10. Zhu J and Marchant R E, 2011, Design properties of
printability of a hydrogel. hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Review of
Medical Devices, vol.8(5): 607–626.
Conflict of Interest and Funding http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/erd.11.27
11. Fan J, Shang Y, Yuan Y, et al., 2010, Preparation and
No conflict of interest was reported by the authors. characterization of chitosan/galactosylated hyaluronic
This work was supported by the Academic Research acid scaffolds for primary hepatocytes culture. Journal
Fund Tier 1 (RG100/13) from the Ministry of Educa- of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol.21(1):
tion, Singapore. 319–327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3833-y
References 12. Hunt J A, Chen R, van Veen T, et al., 2014, Hydrogels
for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Jour-
1. Ozbolat I T and Yu Y, 2013, Bioprinting toward organ
fabrication: Challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans- nal of Materials Chemistry B, vol.2(33): 5319–5338.
actions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.60(3): 691–699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4TB00775A
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912 13. Beyer M, Reichert J, Heurich E, et al., 2010, Pectin, algi-
2. Zhang Y, Tse C, Rouholamin D, et al., 2012, Scaffolds nate and gum arabic polymers reduce citric acid erosion
for tissue engineering produced by inkjet printing. Open effects on human enamel. Dental Materials, vol.26(9):
831–839.
Engineering, vol.2(3): 325–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.008
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s13531-012-0016-2 14. Li Z, Ramay H R, Hauch K D, et al., 2005, Chitosan–
3. Murphy S V and Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tis- alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
sues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, vol.32: 773–785. Biomaterials, vol.26(18): 3919–3928.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.062
4. Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, et al., 2012, A 15. Bao H, Pan Y, Ping Y, et al., 2011, Chitosan‐function-
review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid pro- alized graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for drug and gene
totyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, vol.33(26): delivery. Small, vol.7(11): 1569–1578.
6020–6041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.201100191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 16. Rodríguez-González C, Martínez-Hernández A L, Cas-
5. Cohen D L, Tsavaris A M, Lo W M, et al., 2008, Im- taño V M, et al., 2012, Polysaccharide nanocomposites
proved quality of 3D-printed tissue constructs through reinforced with graphene oxide and keratin-grafted gra-
enhanced mixing of alginate hydrogels. Proceedings of phene oxide. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Re-
the Nineteenth Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, search, vol.51(9): 3619–3629.
676–685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie200742x
6. Jia J, Richards D J, Pollard S, et al., 2014, Engineering 17. Fan H, Wang L, Zhao K, et al., 2010, Fabrication, me-
alginate as bioink for bioprinting. Acta Biomaterialia, chanical properties, and biocompatibility of graphene-
vol.10(10): 4323–4331. reinforced chitosan composites. Biomacromolecules,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.034 vol.11(9): 2345–2351.
7. Kirchmajer D M, Gorkin III R and in het Panhuis M, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm100470q
2015, An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-for- 18. Sui Z, Zhang X, Lei Y, et al., 2011, Easy and green syn-
ming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing. Journal thesis of reduced graphite oxide-based hydrogels. Car-
of Materials Chemistry B, vol.3(20): 4105–4117. bon, vol.49(13): 4314–4321.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5TB00393H http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.006
8. Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, et al., 2002, 19. Chen H, Müller M B, Gilmore K J, et al., 2008, Me-
Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermore- chanically strong, electrically conductive, and biocom-
versible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue patible graphene paper. Advanced Materials, vol.20(18):
engineering. Biomaterials, vol.23(23): 4437–4447. 3557–3561.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800757

International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 2 65