Page 109 - IJB-10-2
P. 109
International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed nanocomposites: Synthesis & applications
57. Tang S, Richardson BM, Anseth KS. Dynamic covalent 3D printed polylactide/nanoclay composites. Compos B Eng.
hydrogels as biomaterials to mimic the viscoelasticity of soft 2018;152:160-168.
tissues. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;120:100738. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.005
doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100738
68. Abdul Haq RH, Wahab MS, Wahid MU. Fused deposition
58. Shitikova MV, Krusser AI. Models of viscoelastic materials: modeling of PCL/HA/MMT biocompatible polymer nano-
a review on historical development and formulation. In: composites. In: Öchsner A, Altenbach H, eds. Machining,
Giorgio I, Placidi L, Barchiesi E, Abali BE, Altenbach H, Joining and Modifications of Adv Mater. Singapore: Springer;
eds. Theoretical Analyses, Computations, and Experiments of 2016: 23-32.
Multiscale Materials: A Tribute to Francesco dell’Isola. Cham: doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1082-8
Springer Nature; 2022: 285-326. 69. Mohan VB, Lau KT, Hui D, Bhattacharyya D. Graphene-
doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-04548-6
based materials and their composites: a review on
59. Pirani SI, Krishnamachari P, Hashaikeh R. Optimum loading production, applications and product limitations. Compos B
level of nanoclay in PLA nanocomposites: impact on the Eng. 2018;142:200-220.
mechanical properties and glass transition temperature. J doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.013
Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2014;27(11):1461-1478. 70. Terrones M, Martín O, González M, et al. Interphases in
doi: 10.1177/0892705712473627
graphene polymer, esb.2018.01.013 review on production,
60. Skylar-Scott MA, Mueller J, Visser CW, Lewis JA. Voxelated applicationsAdv Mater. 2011;23(44):5302-5310.
soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. doi: 10.1002/adma.201102036
Nature. 2019;575(7782):330-335.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1736-8 71. Ganguly S. Preparation/processing of polymer-graphene
composites by different techniques. In: Rahaman M, Nayak
61. Ganguly S, Das P, Das TK, et al. Acoustic cavitation assisted L, Hussein IA, Das NC, eds. Polymer Nanocomposites
destratified clay tactoid reinforced in situ elastomer-mimetic Containing Graphene. USA: Elsevier; 2022: 45-74.
semi-IPN hydrogel for catalytic and bactericidal application. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-821639-2.00015-X
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020;60:104797.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104797 72. Zaman A, Orasugh JT, Banerjee P, et al. Facile one-pot in-situ
synthesis of novel graphene oxide-cellulose nanocomposite
62. Ganguly S, Das NC. Water uptake kinetics and control for enhanced azo dye adsorption at optimized conditions.
release of agrochemical fertilizers from nanoclay-assisted Carbohydr Polym. 2020;246:116661.
semi-interpenetrating sodium acrylate-based hydrogel. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116661
Polym Plast Technol and Eng. 2017;56(7):744-761.
doi: 10.1080/03602559.2016.1233268 73. Ganguly S, Mondal S, Das P, et al. An insight into the
physico-mechanical signatures of silylated graphene oxide in
63. Ganguly S, Das TK, Mondal S, Das NC. Synthesis of poly (ethylene methyl acrylate) copolymeric thermoplastic
polydopamine-coated halloysite nanotube-based hydrogel matrix. Macromol Res. 2019;27:268-281.
for controlled release of a calcium channel blocker. RSC Adv. doi: 10.1007/s13233-019-7039-y
2016;6(107):105350-105362.
doi: 10.1039/C6RA24153K 74. Du J, Cheng HM. The fabrication, properties, and uses of
graphene/polymer composites. Macromol Chem Phys.
64. Weng Z, Wang J, Senthil T, Wu L. Mechanical and thermal 2012;213(10(10ol1060-1077.
properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposites doi: 10.1002/macp.201200029
for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Mater Des. 75. Dai JF, Wang GJ, Ma L, Wu C-K. Surface properties of
2016;102:276-283. graphene: relationship to graphene-polymer composites.
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045
Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2015;40(1):60-71.
65. Cui ZK, Kim S, Baljon JJ, Wu BM, Aghaloo T, Lee 76. Khezri B, Villa K, Novotný F, Sofer Z, Pumera M. Smartdust
M. Microporous methacrylated glycol chitosan- 3Dla K, Novotný F, . 00029 of graphene/polymer composites.
montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel for bone tissue e oxide in poly (ethyleneSmall. 2020;16(33):2002111.
engineering. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3523. doi: 10.1002/smll.202002111
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11511-3
77. Wei X, Li D, Jiang W, et al. 3D printable graphene composite.
66. Ganguly S, Das P. Synthesis and production of polylactic
acid (PLA). In: Parameswaranpillai J, Siengchin S, Salim Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1-7.
NV, George JJ, Poulose A, eds. Polylactic Acid-Based doi: 10.1038/srep11181
Nanocellulose and Cellulose Composites. Boca Raton: CRC 78. Chen S, Wu Q, Mishra C, et al. Thermal conductivity of
Press; 2022: 29-50. isotopically modified graphene. Nat Mater. 2012;11(3):203-207.
doi: 10.1201/9781003160458 doi: 10.1038/nmat3207
67. Paspali A, Bao Y, Gawne DT, Piestert F, Reinelt S. The 79. Chen Q, Mangadlao JD, Wallat J, De Leon A, Pokorski JK,
influence of nanostructure on the mechanical properties of Advincula RC. 3D printing biocompatible polyurethane/poly
Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024) 101 doi: 10.36922/ijb.1637

