Page 55 - IJB-10-2
P. 55

International Journal of Bioprinting                                         Advancements in 3D printing




            cost-efficiency and instigating a fresh industrial paradigm.   and demerits in comparison to other molding techniques.
            Post-2020,  numerous  novel  3D  bioprinting  techniques   Among its merits are elevated molding precision, robustness
            have emerged, such as  in situ printing, suspension   of the printed model, and an array of color choices. On the
            printing, and digital light processing.  Presently, 3D   flip side, it harbors shortcomings, including a relatively
                                            15
            printing boasts wide-ranging applications across domains   coarse surface texture on the molded object.
            such as biomedicine, aerospace, architectural design,
            cultural industries, industrial production, and military   2.3. Direct ink writing
            equipment. 16,17                                   Direct ink writing, also known as robocasting grouting, is
                                                               a process involving the controlled extrusion of ink from
               In this part, we present and compare four primary types   a  temperature-regulated  barrel  through  a  nozzle  onto  a
            of 3D bioprinting technologies, namely fused deposition   substrate using either a screw extrusion or pneumatic
            modeling (FDM), direct ink writing (DIW), selective laser   pressure control system (Figure 2B). The ink is deposited in
            sintering (SLS), and digital light processing (DLP) (Table 1).  a layer-by-layer fashion based on the analysis of model slices
            Abbreviations: DLP, digital light processing; DIW, direct   and the generation of code. Key direct writing parameters
            ink writing; FDM, fused deposition modeling; SLS,   (pressure, speed) and environmental factors (temperature,
            selective laser sintering.                         direct writing medium) significantly influence the process.
                                                               It is crucial to appropriately match the ink with the
            2.2. Fused deposition modeling                     corresponding direct writing parameters and environmental
            Fused deposition modeling is a rapid prototyping process   conditions to ensure structural stability. DIW displays three
            distinct from other techniques as it does not rely on lasers   central attributes. 21,22  Firstly, it offers versatility in material
            as a formative energy source. Instead, it involves the   selection, encompassing metals, ceramics, polymers,
            heating and liquefaction of diverse wire-like materials,   hydrogels, composites, and even biological cells. Secondly,
            such as engineering plastics including polylactic acid   the ink exhibits shear-thinning properties and notable
            (PLA) and polycarbonate (PC), followed by layer-by-layer   viscoelasticity, enabling it to sustain a consistent form and
            construction. 18,19  The formative sequence is described as   layer stacking without collapsing post-extrusion. Thirdly,
            follows (Figure 2A): Controlled by computer algorithms,   the ink boasts elevated solid content, thereby mitigating
            the heating nozzle maneuvers within the XY plane in line   volume and shape alterations during subsequent processing.
            with the cross-sectional outline of the desired product.   Ink solidification can be accomplished through solvents,
            Thermoplastic filament materials are fed into the heating   temperature shifts, gelation, or direct writing media, among
            nozzle via a wire feeding mechanism. Subsequently, these   others. The rheological properties and solid content are
            materials are heated, reaching a semi-liquid state within the   contingent  on the chosen  solidification  mechanism.  Inks
            nozzle, and then extruded. Upon extrusion, the material is   with slower curing rates require solid content with higher
            selectively laid onto the work surface and rapidly cooled,   moduli to ensure proper solidification, whereas inks with
            yielding a slender profile with a designated thickness. After   quicker curing rates can tolerate with solid content of
            each cross-sectional layer is generated, the work surface   lower moduli.  However, DIW does come with certain
                                                                          23
            is lowered, and the subsequent layer is deposited. This   constraints. Primarily, materials must be carefully designed
            iterative process closely resembles the act of “drawing” the   to be compatible with direct writing inks and to flow
            contour of the cross-section, culminating in the creation of   seamlessly through the narrow nozzle, as clogging can occur
            a 3D product.  Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge   otherwise. Secondly, the product’s diameter is often confined
                       20
            that FDM, as a molding technology, bears inherent merits   by the nozzle’s size, and the pattern deposited is restricted by


            Table 1. Comparison of different 3D printing technologies
             Methods       Materials          Fabrication mechanism  Typical     Applications          Cost
                                                                    resolution
             FDM           Thermoplastics     Heating and extruding solid   50–100 μm  Blood vessel, tissue  +
                                              filament
             DIW           Viscoelastic ink   Liquid ink is         1–250 μm     Organ, tissue         +
                                              squeezed through the nozzle
             SLS           Polymers, ceramics,   Melt sintering     1–250 μm     Tooth, skeleton       ++++
                           metals, and composites
             DLP           Optical crosslinking   Optical crosslinking   50–200 μm  Organ, tissue, delivery  +++
                           material


            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                        47                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1752
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60