Page 78 - IJB-10-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Advancements in 3D printing

irradiation, and similar methods, all aimed at achieving the and development, with only a scant number of tangible
desired form. However, these crosslinking methodologies product-level applications thus far.
encounter a significant challenge, notably the potential
to induce harm to cellular structures, proteins, and other 5.5. Multi-technology integration
sensitive materials. Presently, the prevailing strategy The four printing technologies highlighted in section
involves scaffold crosslinking employing substances like 2 exhibit distinct strengths and weaknesses. However,
alginate, followed by cell cultivation atop the scaffold. the existing literature has yet to yield reports that
Within the domain of bioprinting, conventional 3D comprehensively amalgamate these various technologies
printing materials are inadequate, thereby underscoring for simultaneous application. The prospect of employing
the ongoing necessity for innovative material development diverse methods tailored to specific organs is compelling,
to address this predicament. given the intricate nature of biological tissue. The
multifaceted structure of biological tissue necessitates
5.3. High throughput distinct preparation methods for varying components.
The term “high throughput” denotes the capability to The challenge lies in seamlessly harmonizing disparate
concurrently print multiple materials. It is important to realization methods to achieve a unified and cohesive
note that different biological tissues own a diverse array approach. Currently, the integration of these methods
of components, including cell types, proteins, and growth remains a formidable task, one that demands innovative
factors. Thus, this necessitates a more broadened scope solutions to bridge the gap between the intricacies of tissue
of materials for printing, including those with intricate structure and the practicalities of printing technologies.
compositions and structures. As such, this constitutes a
remarkably intricate precision-centric printing technology. 6. Outlooks
Presently, extrusion printing employs a multi-nozzle With the advances in 3D bioprinting and deepening
structure to simultaneously print various materials; crossover of different disciplines, the potential for
however, this approach struggles to maintain precise control revolutionary strides within in vitro living system
over accuracy. In contrast, light-assisted printing lacks an engineering becomes increasingly plausible. Technological
efficient means to seamlessly switch between a multitude of trends signify a shift from employing singular structural
printing materials, thus posing a limitation to its versatility. materials to harnessing functional and biological materials,
5.4. Printing cost underpinned by the scientific groundwork laid by 3D
The cost implications stem from two principal facets: the bioprinting. Concomitantly, progress in cell technology
expense associated with printing equipment and the outlay and biological materials furnishes the essential building
for printing materials. In terms of equipment, extrusion blocks. The crux of this transformative evolution lies in 3D
printing equipment emerges as the more economical bioprinting as a pivotal manufacturing technique. Notably,
choice. Nevertheless, it harbors intrinsic constraints such as the fusion of micro-nanotechnology and microfluidic chip
subpar resolution, compromised cell vitality, compatibility technology has the capacity to engender sophisticated
with a restricted spectrum of applicable materials, as well bionic bioreactors for cultivating living systems and living
as susceptibility to issues like nozzle clogs and pipeline mechanical devices. Collectively, these developments hold
contamination. Separately, light-assisted printing demands the promise of catalyzing paradigmatic shifts within the
a higher initial investment for equipment and entails greater realm of in vitro living system engineering.
technical complexity. In addition to the primary printing 6.1. 3D printing of tissues and organs
apparatus, supplementary equipment such as temperature Indeed, 3D bioprinting represents a pivotal avenue for
and humidity control systems, monitoring devices, and surmounting the challenges of organ transplantation in
other support structures also contribute to the overall cost. the future. It emerges as a crucial approach in addressing
Regarding printing supplies, when it comes to cell- the persistent scarcity of donor organs. Anchored in an
loaded printing, an assortment of cultured cell materials interdisciplinary convergence encompassing biology,
like serum and media are requisite. The delicate nature of materials science, chemistry, computer science, and
cells makes them susceptible to premature demise, thereby various other fields, 3D bioprinting stands as a profound
exacerbating the depletion of consumables. Moreover, the synthesis. This amalgamation of disciplines facilitates the
field of bioprinting is currently marked by a protracted fabrication of human tissues and organs, thereby offering
return-on-investment timeline. This is particularly evident a transformative solution to the critical donor shortfall
in the context of tissue engineering, where the application in organ transplantation. By harnessing the power of 3D
of bioprinting remains primarily confined to research bioprinting, the prospect of manufacturing functional

Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024) 70 doi: 10.36922/ijb.1752