Page 74 - IJB-10-2
        P. 74
     International Journal of Bioprinting                                         Advancements in 3D printing
            Figure 17. Skin repair. (A) 3D-bioprinted pigmented human skin constructs with uniform skin pigmentation.  Copyright © IOP 2018. Reprinted with
                                                                                   121
            permission of IOP. (B) In situ 3D printing in the field of skin repair.  Copyright © Royal Society of Chemistry 2018. Reprinted with permission of Royal
                                                       122
            Society of Chemistry. (C) A 3D skin equivalent composed of dermis and epidermis (normal) and a perfusable and vascularized 3D skin equivalent
                                            123
            composed of hypodermis, dermis, and epidermis.  Copyright © John Wiley and Sons 2019. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley and Sons. (D)
            Histological analysis, performed 8 weeks post-grafting, of bioprinted human skin grafted to immunodeficient mice.  Copyright © IOP 2018. Reprinted
                                                                                      124
            with permission of IOP. (E) Induction of skin tissue regeneration in nude mice.  Copyright © John Wiley and Sons 2021. Reprinted with permission
                                                                125
            of John Wiley and Sons. (F) Representative hematoxylin–eosin staining images of biomimetic multilayer implants on day 14, which accelerated wound
                                                  126
            healing in a murine model of a full-thickness skin defect.  Copyright © American Chemical Society 2023. Reprinted with permission of American
                                                                       127
            Chemical Society. (G) Histological and morphological characterization of bioprinted skin.  Copyright © John Wiley and Sons 2017. Reprinted with
            permission of John Wiley and Sons.
            with increasing DDM particle concentration. Ahmadinejad   (CS) within a GelMA matrix.  They utilized bioprinting
                                                                                       132
            et al. created composite materials, such as PCL/45S5   to create scaffolds loaded with hDPSCs, aiming to assess
            bioglass (BG), and 3D-printed scaffolds using PCL/HA.    their potential to promote tooth formation. The outcomes
                                                         131
            These structures were evaluated separately for dentin and   revealed that CS/GelMA scaffolds not only improved
            pulp tissue regeneration. Their findings indicate that PCL/  the physical and chemical attributes of hDPSCs but also
            BG and PCL/HA scaffolds exhibit the potential to enhance   exhibited enhanced tooth generation capabilities when
            human dental  pulp stem cell (hDPSC) adhesion and   compared to GelMA scaffolds. These findings suggest that
            odontogenic differentiation, contributing to dental tissue   CS/GelMA scaffolds hold promise as cell-loaded materials
            regeneration.                                      for future clinical applications and dentin regeneration.
               Lin  et  al.  conducted research  involving  the   In the work by Wang et al., bilayer scaffolds supported by
            incorporation of varying concentrations of calcium silicate   gingival fibroblasts and composed of collagen and strontium-
            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                        66                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1752
     	
