Page 57 - IJB-3-2
P. 57

Pujiang Shi, et. al.

           Conflict of Interest                                  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1310050
           No conflict of interest is reported by the authors.  10. Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, et al., 2016, 3D printing of functional
                                                                 biomaterials for tissue engineering. Current Opinion in
           Acknowledgement                                       Biotechnology, vol.40: 103–112.

           The authors wish to thank NTU Start up Grant and NTU-  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014
           NHG Innovation Collaboration Grant (ARG-14009) for   11. Liu H, Zhou H, Lan H, et al., 2017, Organ regeneration:
           the support.                                          Integration application of cell encapsulation and 3D bio-
           References                                            printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. In Press.
                                                                 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1338065
           1.  Ramsden C M, Powner M B, Carr A J, et al., 2013, Stem cells   12. Zhao X, He J, Xu F, et al., 2016, Electrohydrodynamic
             in retinal regeneration: Past, present and future. Development,
                                                                 printing: A potential tool for high-resolution hydrogel/cell
             vol.140(12): 2576–2585.                             patterning. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol.11(1): 57–
              https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.092270
           2.  Chiba C, 2014, The retinal pigment epithelium: An important   63.
                                                                 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1139378
             player of retinal disorders and regeneration. Experimental Eye   13. Lorber B, Hsiao W K, Martin K R, 2016, Three-dimensional
             Research, vol.123: 107–114.
                                                                 printing of the retina. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology,
              https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2013.07.009      vol.27(3): 262–267.
           3.  Aramant R B and Seiler M J, 2004, Progress in retinal sheet
                                                                 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000252
             transplantation. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol.   14. Wallace V A, 2011. Concise review: Making a retina—
             23(5): 475–494.
                                                                 From the building blocks to clinical applications. Stem Cells,
              https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.05.003  vol.29(3): 412–417.
           4.  Ghosh F, Juliusson B, Arnér K, et al., 1999, Partial and full-  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stem.602
             thickness neuroretinal transplants. Experimental Eye Research,
                                                               15. Lamba D A, Karl M O, Reh T A, 2009, Strategies for retinal
             vol.68(1): 67–74.                                   repair: Cell replacement and regeneration. In: Neurotherapy:
              https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/exer.1998.0582
                                                                 Progress in Restorative Neuroscience and Neurology,
           5.  Silverman M S and Hughes S E, 1989, Transplantation   Verhaagen J, et al. (eds), Progress in Brain Research, vol.175:
             of photoreceptors to light-damaged retina. Investigative   23–31.
             Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol.30(8): 168–1690.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17502-7
           6.  Hynes S R and Lavik E B, 2010, A tissue-engineered approach   16. Tan E, Agarwala S, Yap Y L, et al., 2017, Novel method
             towards retinal repair: Scaffolds for cell transplantation   for fabrication ultrathin, free-standing and porous polymer
             to the subretinal space. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and   membranes for retinal tissue engineering. Journal of Materials
             Experimental Ophthalmology, vol.248(6): 763–778.    Chemistry B. In Press.
              https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1263-7        https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7TB00376E
           7.  Li J, Chen M, Fan X, et al., 2016, Recent advances in   17. Friedman D S, O’Colmain B J, Muñoz B, et al., 2014,
             bioprinting techniques: Approaches, applications and future   Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United
             prospects. Journal of Translational Medicine, vol.14: 271.   States. Archives of Ophthalmology, vol.122(4): 564–572.
              https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1028-0        https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.4.564
           8.  Fantini M, Curto M, De Crescenzio F, 2016, A method to   18. Wong T Y, Loon S C, Saw S M, 2006, The epidemiology
             design biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering   of age related eye diseases in Asia. The British Journal of
             based on Voronoi lattices. Virtual and Physical Prototyping,   Ophthalmology, vol.90(4): 506–511.
             vol.11(2): 77–90.                                    https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.083733
              https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1172301  19. Schwartz R and Loewenstein A, 2015, Early detection of age
           9.  Cheng K, Mukherjee P, Curthoys I, 2017, Development and   related macular degeneration: Current status. International
             use of augmented reality and 3D printing in consulting patient   Journal of Retina and Vitreous, vol.1(1): 20.
             with complex skull base cholesteatoma. Virtual and Physical   https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-015-0022-7
             Prototyping, vol.12(3): 241–248.                  20. Cheng C L, Saw S M, Pang C E, et al., 2009, Age-related

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 2       145
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62