Page 340 - IJB-10-3
P. 340

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Acoustic analysis of 3D-printed ossicles




                   1E-4                    HA/PCL-TC4-HA/PCL       1E-4                     HA/PCL-316L-HA/PCL
                                           HA/PCL-TC4-316L         1E-5                     HA/PCL-316L-316L
                  Displacement of stapes footplate/mm  1E-6  1E-4  Displacement of stapes footplate/mm  1E-6  1E-4
                                                                                            HA/PCL-316L-TC4
                                           HA/PCL-TC4-TC4
                   1E-5
                                                                                            HA/PCL-316L-HA/PCL
                                           HA/PCL-TC4-HA/PCL
                                                                                            HA/PCL-316L-316L
                                           HA/PCL-TC4-316L
                                                                                            HA/PCL-316L-TC4
                                           HA/PCL-TC4-TC4
                   1E-7
                                                                   1E-7
                                                                   1E-8
                   1E-8
                        1E-6
                   1E-9
                        1E-8
                       1E-10
                            1000  10000                            1E-9  1E-10 1E-6 1E-8  1000  10000
                  1E-10     Frequency/HZ                           1E-10     Frequency/HZ
                     100            1000          10000               100           1000           10000
                                 Frequency/HZ                                     Frequency/HZ
                        (g) Stapes floor displacement of HTx             (h) Stapes floor displacement of H3x
                                           1E-4
                                                                    HA/PCL-HA/PCL-HA/PCL
                                                                    HA/PCL-HA/PCL-316L
                                          Displacement of stapes footplate/mm  1E-6  1E-4
                                                                    HA/PCL-HA/PCL-TC4
                                           1E-5
                                                                    HA/PCL-HA/PCL-HA/PCL
                                                                    HA/PCL-HA/PCL-316L
                                                                    HA/PCL-HA/PCL-TC4
                                           1E-7
                                           1E-8
                                           1E-9
                                                1E-6
                                          1E-10
                                                1E-8
                                                1E-10
                                                     1000  10000
                                          1E-11     Frequency/HZ
                                              100           1000           10000
                                                         Frequency/HZ
                                                 (i) Stapes floor displacement of HHx
                    Figure 7. Comparison of stapes floor displacement between experimental results (dotted line) and simulation results (solid line).
            curves is roughly similar. By performing Tafel linear   Additionally, TC4 exhibits better tensile properties than
            extrapolation, the values of E corr  (self-corrosion potential)   316L. In terms of molding, 316L outperforms both TC4
            and I corr  (self-corrosion current density) can be obtained,   and HA/PCL. The average values from the table data are
            as shown in Table 5. I corr  (self-corrosion current density)   used to represent the material property parameters of the
            is an indicator of the corrosion rate, with a smaller value   ossicular materials.
            indicating slower corrosion, and vice versa. The corrosion
            rate of SLM TC4 was faster than that of 316L. E corr  (self-  4.2. Frequency response analysis of TxH
            corrosion potential) reflects the corrosion trend of metal   Figure 9 shows the stapes floor displacement of three
            materials. A smaller value suggests higher susceptibility   material combinations: TC4-TC4-HA/PCL (TTH),
            to corrosion, whereas a higher value indicates better   TC4-316L-HA/PCL (T3H), and TC4-HA/PCL-HA/PCL
            corrosion resistance. The corrosion potential of SLM 316L   (THH). The densities of the malleus head, malleus neck,
                                                               and malleus handle are 2.55 g/cm³, 4.53 g/cm³, and 3.7 g/
            (-0.355 V) is 37.5% higher than that of TC4 (-0.568 V).
            Both 316L and TC4 exhibit distinct passivation regions,   cm³, while the density of the malleus replaced with TC4
                                                               becomes 4.42 g/cm³. The masses of the three parts became
            with the corrosion resistance of 316L being superior to   1.73, 0.97, and 1.19 times the normal value, respectively,
            that of TC4.
                                                               resulting in an overall mass improvement compared with
               Table 6 presents data obtained from tensile tests   the original parameter model. The elastic modulus of
            conducted on the three materials. The results indicate   the  malleus  changed  from  14.1  GPa  to  110.4  GPa,  and
            that the tensile properties of metal-molded parts   Poisson’s ratio increased by 0.4. The stapes was replaced
            are significantly better than those of plastic parts.   with HA/PCL, and its density changed from 2.2 g/cm  to
                                                                                                          3

            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       332                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2040
   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345