Page 337 - IJB-10-3
P. 337

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Acoustic analysis of 3D-printed ossicles






















                                                Figure 5. 3D-printed artificial ossicles.


            overall trend was verified in the pre-experiment stage, and   including density, elastic modulus, and Poisson’s ratio, were
            in vitro auxiliary detection was conducted. The procedure   obtained. Figure 7 illustrates the comparison between the
            was repeated for the later-described combination. The in   finite element numerical simulation and the experimental
            vitro test results are presented in Figure 6.      trend. The dotted line represents the simulation result,
                                                               while the solid line represents the experimental result.
               In order to determine the auditory characteristics, tests
            were carried out to measure the response of the stapes   Figure 7a indicates that the mallet and masonry of
            footplate  to  sound.  Sound  transmission  experiments   auditory ossicles are both TC4;  Figure 7b indicates that
            demonstrated that the model exhibits behavior similar to   the ankle is TC4, and the silicon muscle is 316L; Figure
            that of the human middle ear.                      7c indicates that the ankle is TC4, and the silicon muscle
                                                               is HA/PCL. Based on this configuration, the displacement
               After conducting the mechanical testing of the materials   trend of the stapes floor is studied by replacing the stapes
            mentioned earlier, the actual property parameters,   with three different materials. In  Figure 7, the solid




































                                                  Figure 6. In vitro test validation.


            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       329                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2040
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342