Page 65 - IJB-4-1
P. 65

An nMgO containing scaffold: Antibacterial activity, degradation properties and cell responses

           differentiation by SEM observation, CCK-8 assay and   Co., Ltd., China), followed by observing with light
           ALP staining, respectively.                         microscope.
            For evaluating cellular adhesion, the cell/scaffold
           specimens were gently washed with PBS, followed     2.7  Statistical Analysis
           by fixing with 2.5% glutaraldehyde. Subsequently, a   Quantitative data were expressed as the mean ± standard
           graded ethanol series was used to dehydrate the cells.   deviation. Levene’s test was applied to examine equality
           Afterwards, the specimens were dried in vacuum drying   of variances. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was
           oven, followed by sputtering with platinum. Finally, the   performed to determine statistical significance. Labels *,
           cellular morphologies were characterized by Phenom   ** and *** represent p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001,
           ProX SEM using backscattering mode under 15 kV      respectively.
           acceleration voltage. For CCK-8 assay, the MG63 cells
           were harvested from the scaffold specimens by Trypsin-  3. Results and Discussion
           ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid solution, followed   The three-dimensional porous scaffold model and a
           by centrifugation treatment. Afterwards, 0.2 mL of   representative SLS-fabricated PHBV/nMgO scaffold
           the obtained supernatant was added into 1 mL of fresh
           culture medium, followed by adding CCK-8 (CK04-     were shown in Figure 1. It could be seen that the shape
           13, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Kimamoto,       and size of the scaffold were consistent with those of
           Japan) solution into it according to the instructions of   the model. The scaffold showed a well ordered and
           the manufacturer, which generated an orange formazan   interconnected porous structure. It was considered that
           product by cellular dehydrogenases. After culture for 4 h   the pore size of scaffolds should be large enough to
           at 37 °C, 100 μL of the sample solution was transferred   ensure nutrient delivery and tissue ingrowth but not too
                                                                                         [30]
                                                                                                       [31]
           into plate to measure the absorbance with a microplate   large to prevent cell migration . Roosa et al.  found
           reader (Beckman, USA) at 450 nm. For ALP staining,   all of the polycaprolactone scaffolds with pore size
           the MG63 cells were washed with PBS, fixed with     from 350 to 800 μm could promote bone regeneration
           4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and then permeated   and there were no significant differences in new bone
           with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min. Subsequently,    formation between them. Similar results were reported
           ALP staining was carried out with 5-bromo-4-chloro-  by Schek et al. [32]  who found significant new bone
           3-indolyl-phosphate/NBT (BCIP/NBT) alkaline         formation for both poly(propylenefumarate)/β-tricalcium
           phosphatase color development kit (P0321, Shanghai   phosphate scaffolds with 300 and 800 μm pores, with no
           Beyotime Biological Technology Co., Ltd, China)     statistical differences between them. Hence, the PHBV/
           according to the instructions of the manufacturer.   nMgO scaffold with pore size of about 400 μm may be
           Finally, the stained cells were mounted with water-  beneficial for substance metabolism, cell responses and
           based mounting medium (Boster Biological Technology   bone regeneration.



                             (A)                   (B)                  (C)











                             (D)                   (E)                  (F)












              Figure 1. (A–C) The three-dimensional porous scaffold model and (D–F) a representative SLS-fabricated PHBV/nMgO scaffold.

           4                           International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 1
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70