Page 70 - IJB-4-1
P. 70

Shuai C, et al.


                       (A)                                    (B)


















                  Figure 8. The (A) mass loss and (B) pH for the PHBV/5%nMgO and PHBV scaffolds as a function of immersion

           MgO was hydrated with water to form Mg(OH) , its    was evaluated in terms of cellular adhesion, proliferation
                                                      2
           crystal lattice would transform from cubic structure to   and osteogenic differentiation. The adhesion morphology
           hexagonal structure, which resulted in significant volume   of MG63 cells on PHBV/5%nMgO and PHBV scaffolds
           expansion [57] . Meanwhile, crystal growth pressure and   after culture for 1, 3 and 5 days was shown in Figure 10.
           water-absorbing swelling pressure of Mg(OH) would   MG63 cells showed an elongated shape and anchored
                                                    2
           further promote the volume expansion [58] . This would   to the surface of the PHBV scaffolds with lamellipodia
           lead to the deterioration of the interface adhesion be-  after 1 day of culture. Some of them gathered together
           tween the particles and matrix, thus making them easy   and formed clusters on day 3. On day 5, most regions
           to outflow and leave large amounts of micropores in the   of the PHBV scaffolds were covered with cell clusters.
           matrix. In return, the pores would significantly increase   As for PHBV/5%nMgO scaffolds, some of MG63
           the specific surface area of the matrix and make water   cells fused to geth er on the surfaces as soon as on day
           permeate more easily, thus promoting the degradation of   1. After 5 days of culture, the entire regions of the
           the scaffolds.                                      PHBV/5%nMgO scaffolds were almost fully covered
            The cytocompatibility of PHBV/5%nMgO scaffolds     with MG63 cells, forming thicker cell clusters than that


                                   (A)               (B)              (C)









                                   (D)               (E)              (F)








                                    (G)







           Figure 9. The surface microtopography of (A, B, C) PHBV scaffolds and (D, E, F) PHBV/5%nMgO scaffolds after immersion in
           PBS for (A, D) 7, (B, E) 21 and (C, F) 35 days; (G) the EDS mapping images of carbon, oxygen and magnesium elements for the
           PHBV/5%nMgO scaffolds after 35 days of immersion.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 1         9
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75