Page 27 - IJB-5-1
P. 27

Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds
           FDM, also known as extrusion-based processes, was first   Figure 7B.  The scaffolds exhibited  close mechanics  to
           put forward by Crump in 1988. In FDM, the materials are   that  of natural  bone in regard to structure  feature  and
           heated up until flowing before extruding or squeezing out   chemical  composition.  In vivo  assays  confirmed  their
           of a nozzle. The extruded fluid subsequently deposited   enchanted biodegradability  and improved new bone
           on the substrate with a layer-wise pattern based on the   formability  (Figure 7C, 7D and 7E), as compared  to
           motion of the nozzle in each layer; then, a 3D scaffold   pure  PCL  scaffolds. Besides,  Kim  et al. [140]   produced  a
           is built layer by layer. A diagram for the FDM process is   scaffold composed of polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)
           depicted in Figure 7A. The accuracy of extruded scaffolds   and β-TCP by FDM. After 12 weeks’ implantation, the
           greatly depends on the printing nozzle.             scaffolds integrated  tightly  with  the  surrounding bone
           FDM technology is mainly applied to process low-fusing   tissue, indicating their good biocompatibility. Poh et al.
           temperature polymer. Hutmacher et al. [130]  reported a use   [141]  fabricated composite scaffolds containing PCL and
           of FDM to fabricate porous scaffolds with PCL, which   bioglass  by FDM. Interestingly,  in  vitro tests  revealed
           presented 0°/60°/120° orientation patterns with the   that the composite scaffold showed an upregulation  of
           porosity more than 56% and pore sizes ranging from 380   osteogenic  gene expression. In addition,  it was found
           to 590 μm. Zhou et al. [131]  fabricated hierarchical polymer   that  the  host  tissue  infiltrated  well  into  the  scaffolds
           scaffolds  with  macropores  between  100  and  800 μm   after  8 weeks’ implantation  into the  nude rats. Though
           through the FDM.  It was demonstrated  that porosity   introducing bioactive ceramics can improve the biological
           printing errors between the obtained scaffolds and the   properties of polymer scaffolds but also brings other
           designed model were <5%, indicating  that  FDM is an   concerns. During FDM of composites, the incorporated
           efficient  technology  to  obtain  scaffolds  with  a  relative   bioceramics  with higher melting point exist in solid
           high accuracy of pore structure. Tellis et al. [132]  combined   phase, which will increase the viscosity and reduce the
           micro-CT and FDM to produce polybutylene terephthalate   fluidity of the slurry and ultimately reduce the accuracy
           scaffolds  before  applying  for trabecular  repair. Kosorn   and efficiency of the molding. On the other hand, due to
           et al. [133]  reported  that  PCL/poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-  the different shrinkage characteristics,  a large number
           valerate) (PHBV) blended porous scaffolds fabricated by   of pores will  form  between  the  ceramic  particles  and
           FDM, founding that the compressive strength increased   matrix, which greatly reduces its mechanical properties.
           with incorporated PHBV increasing. Composite scaffolds   Therefore, a further process is required to compensate for
           based on PCL and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) were also   mechanical properties loss.
           fabricated by FDM [134] .
           Recently, polymers with a relative high melting point   3.4. EBM
           have also been utilized in FDM. For example, polyether
           ether ketone (PEEK) with superior melting point between   A                   B
           330°C and 340°C was developed into scaffolds with a self-
           developed FDM system [135] . In this system, the syringe
           consists of two different metal tubes, including a brass tube
           with an internal diameter of 17 mm attached to a 500 µm
           nozzle and a stainless steel tube. The brass tube with a good
           thermal conductivity was able to help PEEK absorbed
           sufficient energy to get fully melted. Controlling the nozzle
           temperature between 400°C and 430°C and the extrusion
           rate of 2.2 mg/s, PEEK scaffolds with 38% porosity were
           successfully obtained, which showed a compressive yield
           strength of 29.34 MPa and a compressive yield strain   C
           of 4.4%. Furthermore, Rinaldi  et al. [136]  also reported a
           potential usage of FDM in fabricating PEEK scaffolds.
           However, with high melting point polymers in FDM,
           severe shrinkage, warpage, and delamination normally
           occur due to the sharp temperature gradient caused by
           the relative high extrusion temperature.  Therefore, it is   Figure 8. (A) A  schematic  diagram for electron  beam  melting
                                                              (EBM) equipment. (B) Micro-computed tomography images
           necessary to control the cooling process in FDM.   showing the geometry of EBM-processed scaffolds, and scanning
           FDM  has also been reported for the preparation of   electron  microscope images showing the responding roughness
           polymer and ceramic composite scaffolds [137,138] . Xu et al.  surface [147] . (C)  Undecalcified  toluidine  blue  stained  images
           [139]  used CT-guided FDM  to fabricate  PCL/HA bones   showing the pattern of bone formation after the implantation of
           scaffolds with  cortical  bonelike  features,  as shown in   EBM-derived Ti6Al4V and CoCr scaffolds.


           10                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32