Page 85 - IJB-5-2

Arab W, et al.
Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss. Biomaterials, DOI 10.1177/0363546505274714.
206:160-9. DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.036. 15. Järvinen TA, Kääriäinen M, Järvinen M, Kalimo H, 2000,
2. Kim JH, Seol YJ, Ko IK, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinted Human Muscle Strain Injuries. Current Opinion in Rheumatology,
Skeletal Muscle Constructs for Muscle Function Restoration. 12(2):155-61. DOI 10.1097/00002281-200003000-00010.
Scientific Reports, 8:12307. DOI 10.1038/s41598-018- 16. Corona BT, Wu X, Ward CL, et al., 2013, The Promotion
29968-5. of a Functional Fibrosis in Skeletal Muscle with Volumetric
3. VanDusen KW, Syverud BC, Williams ML, et al., 2014, Muscle Loss Injury following the Transplantation of muscle-
Engineered Skeletal Muscle Units for Repair of Volumetric Muscle ECM. Biomaterials, 34(13):3324-35. DOI 10.1016/j.
Loss in the Tibialis Anterior Muscle of a Rat. Tissue Engineering biomaterials.2013.01.061.
Part A, 20(21-22):2920-30. DOI 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0060. 17. Manring H, Abreu E, Brotto L, et al., 2014, Novel Excitation-
4. Chua CK, Yeong WY, 2014, Bioprinting: Principles and contraction Coupling Related Genes Reveal Aspects of
Applications. Vol. 1. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Muscle Weakness Beyond Atrophy new Hopes for Treatment
Co, Inc. of Musculoskeletal Diseases. Frontiers in Physiology, 5:37.
5. Kwee BJ, Mooney DJ, 2017, Biomaterials for Skeletal Muscle DOI 10.3389/fphys.2014.00037.
Tissue Engineering. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 18. Grasman JM, Zayas MJ, Page RL, et al., 2015, Biomimetic
47:16-22. DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.05.003. Scaffolds for Regeneration of Volumetric Muscle Loss
6. Frontera WR, Ochala J, 2015, Skeletal muscle: A Brief Review in Skeletal Muscle Injuries. Acta Biomaterialia, 25:2-15.
of Structure and Function. Calcified Tissue International, DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.038.
96(3):183-95. DOI 10.1007/s00223-014-9915-y. 19. Mase VJ, Hsu JR, Wolf SE, et al., 2010, Clinical Application of
7. Beldjilali-Labro M, Garcia AG, Farhat F, et al., 2018, an Acellular Biologic Scaffold for Surgical Repair of a Large,
Biomaterials in Tendon and Skeletal Muscle Tissue Traumatic Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Defect. Orthopedics,
Engineering: Current Trends and Challenges. Materials, 33(7):511. DOI 10.3928/01477447-20100526-24.
11(7):1116. DOI 10.3390/ma11071116. 20. Zorlutuna P, Annabi N, Camci-Unal G, et al., 2012,
8. Relaix F, Zammit PS, 2012, Satellite Cells are Essential for Skeletal Microfabricated Biomaterials for Engineering 3D Tissues.
Muscle Regeneration: The Cell on the Edge Returns Centre Stage. Advanced Materials, 24(14):1782-804. DOI 10.1002/
Development, 139(16):2845-56. DOI 10.1242/dev.069088. adma.201104631.
9. Brack AS, Rando TA, 2012, Tissue-specific Stem Cells: 21. Hauser CA, Zhang S, 2010, Designer Self-assembling Peptide
Lessons from the Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cell. Cell Stem Nanofiber Biological Materials. Chemical Society Reviews,
Cell, 10(5):504-14. DOI 10.1016/j.stem.2012.04.001. 39(8):2780-90. DOI 10.1039/b921448h.
10. Grogan BF, Hsu JR, Consortium STR, 2011, Volumetric 22. Loo Y, Zhang S, Hauser CA, 2012, From Short Peptides to
Muscle Loss. JAAOS Journal of the American Academy of Nanofibers to Macromolecular Assemblies in Biomedicine.
Orthopaedic Surgeons, 19:S35-7. DOI 10.5435/00124635- Biotechnology Advances, 30(3):593-603. DOI 10.1016/j.
201102001-00007. biotechadv.2011.10.004.
11. Turner NJ, Badylak SF, Regeneration of Skeletal Muscle. 23. Wu EC, Zhang S, Hauser CA, 2012, Self-assembling
Cell and Tissue Research, 347(3):759-74. DOI 10.1007/ Peptides as Cell-interactive Scaffolds. Advanced Functional
s00441-011-1185-7. Materials, 22(3):456-68. DOI 10.1002/adfm.201101905.
12. Lynch GS, Schertzer JD, Ryall JG, 2008, Anabolic Agents for 24. Hauser CA, Deng R, Mishra A, et al., 2011, Natural Tri-to
Improving Muscle Regeneration and Function After Injury. Hexapeptides Self-assemble in Water to Amyloid β-type Fiber
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, Aggregates by Unexpected α-helical Intermediate Structures.
35(7):852-58. DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04955.x. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
13. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, et al., 2007, Muscle 108(4):1361-6. DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014796108.
Injuries: Optimising Recovery. Best Practice and Research 25. Mishra A, Loo Y, Deng R, et al., 2011, Ultrasmall Natural
Clinical Rheumatology, 21(2):317-31. DOI 10.1016/j. Peptides Self-assemble to Strong Temperature-resistant
berh.2006.12.004. Helical Fibers in Scaffolds Suitable for Tissue Engineering.
14. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, et al., Nano Today, 6(3):232-9. DOI 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.06.010.
2005, Muscle Injuries: Biology and Treatment. The 26. Pollot BE, Rathbone CR, Wenke JC, et al., 2018, Natural
American Journal of Sports Medicine, 33(5):745-64. Polymeric Hydrogel Evaluation for Skeletal Muscle Tissue

International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 2 81