Page 105 - IJB-6-3
P. 105

Bozo, et al.
           0.002, respectively. Materials resorbed form        implantation. Since day 15, a highly vascularized
           their  surfaces and  within a  zone  of the  direct   connective  tissue capsule with a thickness of
           contact to soft tissues. The diameter and volume    50 – 70  μm formed around implants. However,
           gradually  reduced  and  the  “surface-to-volume”   cellular and tissue elements did not penetrate into
           ratio increased both in 3D printed scaffolds and    OCP structure. Starting from day 45, in some parts
           gene-activated  implants.  An average  diameter     of the implants there were defects in the structure,
           decreased more intensively  with an abrupt drop     their number and size gradually increased by day
           by day 40 and a subsequent stabilization  and a     180  by  forming  “cavities  of  dissolution”  with
           smooth decline in the test group, while its change   a diameter  of 30 – 50  μm and scalloped  edges
           being almost linear in the control group.  There    that  indicated biodegradation.  There  were no
           was a two-fold volume  reduction  by day 60 in      multinucleated foreign bony giant cells. On day
           both groups (Figure 4).                             180 after  implantation,  connective  tissue  grew
             We found no histological signs of inflammation    inside the implants to 50 – 70 μm from a surface
           in the area of 3D  printed OCP (control)            (Figure 4).


           A










           B
















                                           C                               D                                 E














           Figure 4. 3D printed OCP-based-(control group) and gene-activated (test group) implants in subcutaneous
           in vivo test, biodegradation study. (A) Histological analysis: (1) implants, (2) fibrous tissue; (B) 3D
           microCT images (1) (control (up) and (2) test (down) groups); (C, D, F) Kinetic  of biodegradation
           parameters: red – control group (1); blue – test group (2). *differences between the group are statistically
           significant, P < 0.05.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 3       101
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110