Page 482 - IJB-10-6
P. 482

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Nanomaterial-bioinks for DLP bioprinting




            described. 67,68  The use of human tissue was approved by   nanoparticles (particle size: < 150  nm) (Sigma-Aldrich,
            the local ethical advisory board of the University Medical   USA) were added to the bioink at a concentration of 50 mg/
            Center in Kiel (approval number: D459/13) and included   mL. Before printing, the resulting ink (GelMaBB-CaP) was
            the consent of the individual donors. Cells were precultured   incubated at 37°C for 2 h to allow swelling of CaP particles
            in osteogenic differentiation medium (ODM), i.e., DMEM   and a homogeneous consistency of the bioink. In addition,
            F12 (PAN Biotech, Germany), supplemented with 10%   the GelMa bioink was modified with GO, provided by the
            fetal bovine serum (FBS; PAN Biotech, Germany), 1%   technical faculty at Kiel University. GO was added at a final
            penicillin/streptomycin (Biochrom, Germany), 0.1  µM   concentration of 0.5 mg/mL to the bioink (GelMaGO). The
            dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, United States of America   bioinks were loaded with 3 × 10  hMSC/mL bioink before
                                                                                         6
            [USA]), 50 µM ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and   the DLP bioprinting process.
            10  µM  ß-glycerolphosphate  (Sigma-Aldrich,  USA),  to
            induce osteogenic differentiation. For the printing process,   2.5. Bioprinting of constructs using DLP technology
            hMSCs (passages 3 and 4) were added to different types   Tissue  constructs  were  printed  by  DLP  using  LumenX
            of bioinks.                                        (Cellink, Sweden) equipped with LightField software. To
                                                               print under sterile conditions, the Lumen X printer was
            2.4. Formulation and modifications of              placed under a laminar flow bench, and sterile equipment
            different bioinks                                  was used. The printbed and printhead were further treated
            Different types of GelMa-based bioinks were formulated   with 70% ethanol. For the printing process, 1 mL bioink
            and compared in terms of their printability and    was loaded into the printer, resulting in three constructs
            biocompatibility, both before and after modification with   for the given design. The printbed temperature was set to
            nanomaterials. In this context, a commercially available   37°C. Details of the printing parameters are listed in Table
            GelMa bioink (GelMa PhotoInk; Cellink, Sweden) served   S2, Supporting Information and were identical for all
            as reference material for the evaluation process. The basis   bioinks. The 3D model was sliced into layers of 100 µm
            of the different bioinks was formulated using sterile GelMa   height. The first layer was exposed with a factor of 4. The
            with a methacrylation degree of 80% (GelMa; Gelomics,   exposure time of the light was 9 s, with an intensity of 70%
            Australia). In brief, GelMa was dissolved in ODM at a   (33.6 mW/cm ). After the printing process, gel-based tissue
                                                                          2
            concentration of 100  mg/mL. Lithium-phenyl-2,4,6-  constructs were transferred to a 24-well plate (Sarstedt,
            tri-methylbenzoylphosphinate  (LAP;  Sigma-Aldrich,
            USA) was used in all bioinks as a photo-initiator at a   Germany) and washed three times with phosphate-
            final concentration of 5 mg/mL.  In contrast, the photo-  buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco by Life Technologies, USA)
                                      69
            absorber concentration varied between the different   for 10 min each. Each construct was then placed in 2 mL
            bioinks (Table 1). As indicated in Table 1, Brilliant Black   of ODM and further cultured at 37°C and 5% CO 2 for
            (BB) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used as a photo-absorber   the indicated time points. For the controls, samples with
            at a final concentration of 0.5  mg/mL, dissolved in   and without cells were printed as indicated in the sections
            ODM. The components of the bioink (LAP and BB) were   for  the  individual  analyzing  methods.  Scaffolds  with  or
            individually filtered (Filtropur 0.2 µm; Sarstedt, Germany)   without cells were treated and cultured in the same way for
            for sterilization.                                 a better comparison.
               Different nanomaterials were investigated for further   2.6. Diameter and weight of the GelMa constructs
            functionalization of the GelMa-based bioink. To enhance   The weight and the diameter of the constructs consisting of
            the osteoinductive properties of the GelMa bioink, CaP   the different GelMa-based inks (GelMaBB, GelMaBB-CaP,


            Table 1. Ingredients of different modified bioinks.
                                                                               Modified bioinks
            Ingredient
                                             GelMaBB                GelMaBB-CaP               GelMaGO
            GelMa (mg/mL)                      100                      100                     100 
            LAP (mg/mL)                         5                       5                        5 
            BB (mg/mL)                         0.5                      0.5                     —
            CaP (mg/mL)                         —                       50                      —
            GO (mg/mL)                          —                       —                       0.5 
            Abbreviations: GelMa: Gelatin methacrylamide; LAP: Lithium-phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate; BB: Brilliant Black; CaP: Calcium phosphate;
            GO: Graphene oxide.

            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       474                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4015
   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487