Page 483 - IJB-10-6
P. 483

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Nanomaterial-bioinks for DLP bioprinting




            GelMaGO, and the commercial ink) without cells were   2.9. Porosity of the GelMa-based constructs
            measured every day for seven days (n = 6). To measure   The density of the GelMa-based constructs (GelMaBB,
            the diameter of the construct, an image of the construct   GelMaBB-CaP, and GelMaGO) (n  =  12) was analyzed
            was taken. Using a ruler and the program ImageJ (version   using a specific gravity measurement kit (Shimadzu
            2.3.0/1.53q), the pixel aspect ratio was calculated. In   Corporation, Japan). The solid density in ultra-pure water at
            addition, the weight of the constructs was measured with   24°C for cell-free constructs was measured (water density:
            a precision scale (BP 211 D; Sartorius Lab Instruments   0.9973 g/cm³). The density ρ was calculated according to
            GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) every day for seven days.   Equation I. The density of the materials using GelMaBB,
            After printing, constructs were directly weighted, which   GelMaBB-CaP, and GelMaGO was determined by printing
            accounted for day 0. The measurements were performed at   solid constructs with the same dimensions as the porous
            room temperature.                                  constructs. These solid constructs were measured using the
                                                               gravimetry method (n = 4).
            2.7. Micro-computed tomography and data analysis
            Freeze-dried samples were mounted on custom-built
            holders, imaged with a micro-computed tomography                                               (I)
            (micro-CT) scanner (VivaCT-80; Scanco Medical AG,
            Switzerland), and reconstructed using the manufacturer’s
            tomography software (V. 6.4-2). All freeze-dried samples   Wa: Solid specimen weight in air, Wl: Solid specimen
            were embedded in foam and scanned at a tube voltage of   weight in the liquid medium, ρl: Density of the medium
            45 kVp, beam current of 177 μA, with a 0.1 mm aluminum   liquid. The porosity was calculated with Equation II.
            filter, an integration time of 300 ms, a field of view (FOV)
            with a diameter of 34.4 mm, 1500 projections/180 °, using                                      (II)
            3072 × 3072 sample size, resulting in an isotropic voxel size
            of (11.2 μm) .
                      3
                                                                  P: Porosity,  ρp: Density of the porous construct,  ρm
               For primary visualization and inspection of the   Density of the material (solid construct).
            DICOM datasets, the free, open-source software 3D slicer
            (https://www.slicer.org/)  was  used.   Histogram-based   2.10. Scanning electron microscopy and surface
                                          70
            segmentations of the constructs in 3D Slicer were exported   structure of printed samples
            as 3D meshes (.stl format), which were then cleaned and   Cell-free constructs consisting of the different GelMa-
            visualized using MeshLab (https://www.meshlab.net). 71  based bioinks (GelMaBB, GelMaBB-CaP, GelMaGO, and
                                                               commercial ink) were dehydrated in an increasing alcohol
               ImageJ was used to measure the pore sizes by visually   series of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100% ethanol. The final
            identifying a region of interest (ROI) along the Z-axis. For   step with 100% ethanol was repeated three times to prepare
            noise reduction, 3D Gaussian blur filter (1 px) was applied,   the samples for critical point drying (LEICA EM CPD
            before the maximum intensity projections in the ROIs were   300; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Germany). The samples
            created using a limited number of images (GelMaBB = 26   were critical point dried at 40°C and 79–80 bars of CO .
                                                                                                            2
            images;  GelMaGO  =  20 images;  GelMaBB-CaP  =  18   The samples were mounted onto a holder with a carbon
            images). The peak positions of line profile plots were used   Leit-Tab (Plano GmbH, Germany) and sputter-coated with
            to measure the pore wall distances; for GelMaGO and   gold-palladium (10 nm thickness) using a Leica EM SCD
            GelMaBB-CaP constructs, only pores with small cell wall   500 High-Vacuum  sputter-coater  (Leica  Microsystems
            length ratios were used.                           GmbH, Germany). The samples were scanned at 15  kV
                                                               using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) Hitachi
            2.8. Water absorption of the GelMa-based constructs  TM300 (Hitachi High-Tech, Japan).
            The  water  absorption  capacity  of  the  printed  GelMaBB,
            GelMaBB-CaP, and GelMaGO constructs (n  =  12) was   2.11. Live/dead and actin cytoskeleton staining
            evaluated. After printing and subsequent washing steps,   analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy
            cell-free constructs were weighed. The samples were then   Live/dead staining after 7 and 14 days of culture was
            subjected to freeze-drying using a Scanvac Coolsafe 55-9   performed by adding 5 µg/mL calcein AM (Sigma-Aldrich,
            PRO freeze dryer (Labogene, Denmark), and the dry   USA) to the culture medium to stain living cells; 2 µg/mL
            weight was determined. The water absorption capacity was   propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to
            calculated by the difference between the initial wet weight   stain dead cells. The samples were incubated in the staining
            and the dry weight.                                solution for 30 min before washing with a new medium and



            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       475                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4015
   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488