Page 99 - IJB-7-1
P. 99
Cunico
Figure 4. Standardized main effect of control factors on feasibility, flexural strength, and shrinkage.
Figure 5. Comparison diagram of proposal feasibility as a function of holding temperature and holding time.
area was highlighted by high densification and excess of time were of high densification and grain size and
deformation due to a decrease in viscosity. In addition, were bigger than the grain in material produced at low
this reduction indicated mold infiltration and subsequent temperatures. This situation is shown in Figure 6, where
incrustation of collapsed mold on object surface. The the comparison of material densification and grain size is
materials obtained at high temperature with long holding presented.
International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 1 95
