Page 111 - IJB-7-2
P. 111

Arguchinskaya, et al.
           of the  cross-section  number  on the  quality  of supports   creation  (involved  subtracting  the  model  of thyroid
           obtained are presented in Figure 3A.                cartilage from the extruded projections) could lead to the
               The  volume  of  the  support  increases  with  an   formation of areas with walls thinner than the size of a
           increment of slice number. An intermediate value (2 mm)   dispenser nozzle. In this case, a proper slicing procedure
           was approved for the study. The use of a smaller step   (g-code creation) would fail. Ultimately, it would lead to
           unnecessarily  complicates  the model  increasing  the   areas where the main material will not have support. In
           number of polygons (6.81 × 104 for 0.5 mm step), thus,   Figure 4A-C, such an analysis is presented by means of
           making  the  process of the  support creation  more  time   Meshmixer for the supports with different steps of cross-
           consuming,  necessitating  further  modification  which   section (conversation into the solid body was carried out
           would toughen both software and hardware.requirements.  in accordance with standard software parameters). The
               Analysis of the effect of each slice (Figure 3B) on   disagreement  of wall  thickness with  minimal  possible
           the formation of the supporting part of the scaffold showed   value is specific for all variants. To solve this issue, three
           that the greatest increase in the volume of the support is   options were applied in “Accurate mode,” as shown in
           determined by two sets of sections. The first set, which   Table 2.
           is in the range of 2÷6 mm, is responsible for the base of   The considered parameters refer to the number of
           the support. The second set (12÷24 mm) contributes to the   voxels used in the courses of primary (“Solid accuracy”)
           model due to a slope of thyroid cartilage walls. A smaller   and secondary (“Mesh density”) approximation of the
           impact is made by the group of slices in the range of 30÷34   model, as well as the restriction of minimal thickness.
           mm. However, they are responsible for an important
           part of the model which especially needs support. These   Table 2. Meshmixer conversation parameters
           elements are shown in the upper right part of Figure 1C.
                                                               Procedure      Solid     Mesh          Min
           3.3. Assessment and modification of the support                  accuracy   density   thickness, mm
           wall thickness                                      1              128        128          0.52
           Further  processing of support model  included      2              128        128          1.03
           modification of wall thickness. The process of supporting   3       96        512          0.52

                        A                          B                   C














           Figure 2. The process of support creation. (A) Cross-sections with 2 mm step. (B) The volume formed by extruding of each slice to the base.
           (C) The complete support model obtained by subtracting the thyroid cartilage model from the model in Figure 1(A).

                        A                                   B














           Figure 3. The effect of cross-section number on the quality of supporting part of the scaffold. (A) Dependence of the overall volume (model
           quality) and a number of polygons (model complexity) on the step of the cross-section in the range of 0.5÷8 mm. (B) Volume increases for
           each new slice (from the bottom one) and area of each section for 2 mm step.
                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2       107
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116