Page 92 - IJB-7-2
P. 92

A Scientometric Analysis
               Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:1–23.  Cancer Models for Drug Resistance Study. ACS Biomater Sci
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701204              Eng, 4:4401–11.
           176.  Kuss MA, Harms R, Wu S, et al., 2017, Short-term Hypoxic      https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01277
               Preconditioning  Promotes Prevascularization  in 3D   186.  Kuss M, Kim J, Qi D,  et al.,  2018,  Effects  of  Tunable,
               Bioprinted Bone Constructs with Stromal Vascular Fraction   3D-bioprinted Hydrogels on Human Brown  Adipocyte
               Derived Cells. RSC Adv, 7:29312–20.                 Behavior and Metabolic Function. Acta Biomater, 71:486–95.
               https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra04372d                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.021
           177.  Mouser  VHM, Abbadessa A,  Levato  R,  et al., 2017,   187.  Ebrahimi M, Ostrovidov S, Salehi S, et al., 2018, Enhanced
               Development  of a  Thermosensitive  HAMA-containing   Skeletal  Muscle  Formation  on  Microfluidic  Spun  Gelatin
               Bio-ink for the Fabrication  of Composite Cartilage  Repair   Methacryloyl (GelMA) Fibres Using Surface Patterning and
               Constructs. Biofabrication, 9:15026.                Agrin Treatment. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 12:2151–63.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa6265            https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2738
           178.  Ma K, Zhao T, Yang L, et al., 2020, Application of Robotic-  188.  Wang Y, Kankala RK, Zhu K, et al., 2019, Coaxial Extrusion
               assisted In Situ 3D Printing in Cartilage Regeneration with   of Tubular Tissue Constructs Using a Gelatin/GelMA Blend
               HAMA Hydrogel: An In Vivo Study. J Adv Res, 23:123–32.  Bioink. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5:5514–24.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.01.010          https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00926
           179.  Zhou M, Lee  BH,  Tan  YJ,  et al., 2019, Microbial   189.  Parthiban  SP, Rana  D, Jabbari E,  et  al., 2017, Covalently
               Transglutaminase  Induced Controlled  Crosslinking of   Immobilized  VEGF-Mimicking Peptide  with Gelatin
               Gelatin Methacryloyl to Tailor Rheological Properties for 3D   Methacrylate Enhances Microvascularization of Endothelial
               Printing. Biofabrication, 11:25011.                 Cells. Acta Biomater, 51:330–40.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab063f            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.046
           180.  Salinas-Fernández  S, Santos  M,  Alonso M,  et  al.,  2020,   190.  Shao L, Gao Q, Zhao H, et al., 2018, Fiber-Based Mini Tissue
               Genetically  Engineered Elastin-like Recombinamers  with   with  Morphology-Controllable  GelMA  Microfibers.  Small,
               Sequence-based  Molecular  Stabilization  as  Advanced   14:1–8.
               Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Appl Mater Today, 18:100500.     https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802187
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100500      191.  Lee VK, Kim DY, Ngo H, et al., 2014, Creating Perfused
           181.  Rinoldi  C,  Costantini  M,  Kijeńska-Gawrońska  E,  et  al.,   Functional  Vascular Channels Using 3D Bio-printing
               2019, Tendon Tissue Engineering: Effects of Mechanical and   Technology. Biomaterials, 35:8092–102.
               Biochemical Stimulation on Stem Cell Alignment on Cell-     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.083
               Laden Hydrogel Yarns. Adv Healthc Mater, 8(7):1801218.  192.  Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al., 2016, Direct
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801218              3D  Bioprinting of Perfusable  Vascular Constructs Using  a
           182.  Swaminathan S, Hamid Q, Sun W, et al., 2019, Bioprinting   Blend Bioink. Biomaterials, 106:58–68.
               of 3D Breast Epithelial Spheroids for Human Cancer Models.      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038
               Biofabrication, 11:025003.                      193.  Shao L, Gao Q, Xie C, et al., 2020, Sacrificial Microgel-laden
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aafc49            Bioink-enabled 3D Bioprinting of Mesoscale Pore Networks.
           183.  Gu Q,  Tomaskovic-Crook  E,  Lozano  R,  et  al.,  2016,   Biodesign Manuf, 3:30–9.
               Functional 3D Neural Mini-Tissues from Printed Gel-Based      https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00062-y
               Bioink and Human Neural Stem Cells. Adv Healthc Mater,   194.  Haring AP, Thompson EG, Tong Y, et al., 2019, Process-and
               5:1429–38.                                          Bio-inspired  Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting  of Soft Free-
               https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600095  standing Neural and Glial Tissues. Biofabrication, 11:25009.
           184.  Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting of Urethra      https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab02c9
               with PCL/PLCL Blend and Dual Autologous Cells in Fibrin   195.  Saadati  A, Hassanpour S, Hasanzadeh M,  et al., 2019,
               Hydrogel: An In Vitro Evaluation of Biomimetic Mechanical   Immunosensing of Breast Cancer  Tumor Protein CA 15-3
               Property and Cell  Growth Environment.  Acta Biomater,   (Carbohydrate Antigen 15.3) Using a Novel Nano-bioink: A
               50:154–64.                                          New Platform for Screening of Proteins in Human Biofluids by
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008        Pen-on-paper Technology. Int J Biol Macromol, 132:748–58.
           185.  Wang Y, Shi W, Kuss M, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Breast      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.170

           88                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97