Page 92 - IJB-7-2
P. 92
A Scientometric Analysis
Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:1–23. Cancer Models for Drug Resistance Study. ACS Biomater Sci
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701204 Eng, 4:4401–11.
176. Kuss MA, Harms R, Wu S, et al., 2017, Short-term Hypoxic https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01277
Preconditioning Promotes Prevascularization in 3D 186. Kuss M, Kim J, Qi D, et al., 2018, Effects of Tunable,
Bioprinted Bone Constructs with Stromal Vascular Fraction 3D-bioprinted Hydrogels on Human Brown Adipocyte
Derived Cells. RSC Adv, 7:29312–20. Behavior and Metabolic Function. Acta Biomater, 71:486–95.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra04372d https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.021
177. Mouser VHM, Abbadessa A, Levato R, et al., 2017, 187. Ebrahimi M, Ostrovidov S, Salehi S, et al., 2018, Enhanced
Development of a Thermosensitive HAMA-containing Skeletal Muscle Formation on Microfluidic Spun Gelatin
Bio-ink for the Fabrication of Composite Cartilage Repair Methacryloyl (GelMA) Fibres Using Surface Patterning and
Constructs. Biofabrication, 9:15026. Agrin Treatment. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 12:2151–63.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa6265 https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2738
178. Ma K, Zhao T, Yang L, et al., 2020, Application of Robotic- 188. Wang Y, Kankala RK, Zhu K, et al., 2019, Coaxial Extrusion
assisted In Situ 3D Printing in Cartilage Regeneration with of Tubular Tissue Constructs Using a Gelatin/GelMA Blend
HAMA Hydrogel: An In Vivo Study. J Adv Res, 23:123–32. Bioink. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5:5514–24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2020.01.010 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00926
179. Zhou M, Lee BH, Tan YJ, et al., 2019, Microbial 189. Parthiban SP, Rana D, Jabbari E, et al., 2017, Covalently
Transglutaminase Induced Controlled Crosslinking of Immobilized VEGF-Mimicking Peptide with Gelatin
Gelatin Methacryloyl to Tailor Rheological Properties for 3D Methacrylate Enhances Microvascularization of Endothelial
Printing. Biofabrication, 11:25011. Cells. Acta Biomater, 51:330–40.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab063f https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.046
180. Salinas-Fernández S, Santos M, Alonso M, et al., 2020, 190. Shao L, Gao Q, Zhao H, et al., 2018, Fiber-Based Mini Tissue
Genetically Engineered Elastin-like Recombinamers with with Morphology-Controllable GelMA Microfibers. Small,
Sequence-based Molecular Stabilization as Advanced 14:1–8.
Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Appl Mater Today, 18:100500. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802187
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100500 191. Lee VK, Kim DY, Ngo H, et al., 2014, Creating Perfused
181. Rinoldi C, Costantini M, Kijeńska-Gawrońska E, et al., Functional Vascular Channels Using 3D Bio-printing
2019, Tendon Tissue Engineering: Effects of Mechanical and Technology. Biomaterials, 35:8092–102.
Biochemical Stimulation on Stem Cell Alignment on Cell- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.083
Laden Hydrogel Yarns. Adv Healthc Mater, 8(7):1801218. 192. Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al., 2016, Direct
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801218 3D Bioprinting of Perfusable Vascular Constructs Using a
182. Swaminathan S, Hamid Q, Sun W, et al., 2019, Bioprinting Blend Bioink. Biomaterials, 106:58–68.
of 3D Breast Epithelial Spheroids for Human Cancer Models. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038
Biofabrication, 11:025003. 193. Shao L, Gao Q, Xie C, et al., 2020, Sacrificial Microgel-laden
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aafc49 Bioink-enabled 3D Bioprinting of Mesoscale Pore Networks.
183. Gu Q, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Lozano R, et al., 2016, Biodesign Manuf, 3:30–9.
Functional 3D Neural Mini-Tissues from Printed Gel-Based https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00062-y
Bioink and Human Neural Stem Cells. Adv Healthc Mater, 194. Haring AP, Thompson EG, Tong Y, et al., 2019, Process-and
5:1429–38. Bio-inspired Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting of Soft Free-
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600095 standing Neural and Glial Tissues. Biofabrication, 11:25009.
184. Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting of Urethra https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab02c9
with PCL/PLCL Blend and Dual Autologous Cells in Fibrin 195. Saadati A, Hassanpour S, Hasanzadeh M, et al., 2019,
Hydrogel: An In Vitro Evaluation of Biomimetic Mechanical Immunosensing of Breast Cancer Tumor Protein CA 15-3
Property and Cell Growth Environment. Acta Biomater, (Carbohydrate Antigen 15.3) Using a Novel Nano-bioink: A
50:154–64. New Platform for Screening of Proteins in Human Biofluids by
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008 Pen-on-paper Technology. Int J Biol Macromol, 132:748–58.
185. Wang Y, Shi W, Kuss M, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Breast https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.170
88 International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2

