Page 89 - IJB-7-2

González, et al.
Bioinks for Three-Dimensional Printing in Regenerative Nanotechnology, 29:185101.
Medicine. Academic Press, London, pp. 805–830. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aaafa1
111. Choi YJ, Jun YJ, Kim DY, et al., 2019, A 3D Cell Printed 121. Huang S, Yao B, Xie J, et al., 2016, 3D Bioprinted Extracellular
Muscle Construct with Tissue-derived Bioink for the Matrix Mimics Facilitate Directed Differentiation of
Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss. Biomaterials, Epithelial Progenitors for Sweat Gland Regeneration. Acta
206:160–9. Biomater, 32:170–7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.036 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.039
112. Chu DT, Nguyen TPT, Nguyen LBT, et al., 2019, Adipose 122. Gu Q, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Wallace GG, et al., 2017, 3D
Tissue Stem Cells for Therapy: An Update on the Progress of Bioprinting Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Constructs
Isolation, Culture, Storage, and Clinical Application. J Clin for In Situ Cell Proliferation and Successive Multilineage
Med, 8:917. Differentiation. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:1700175.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070917 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700175
113. Xu W, Zhang XX, Yang P, et al., 2019, Alginate-honey 123. Li Y, Jiang X, Li L, et al., 2018, 3D Printing Human Induced
Bioinks with Improved Cell Responses for Applications as Pluripotent Stem Cells with Novel Hydroxypropyl Chitin
Bioprinted Tissue Engineered Constructs. ACS Appl Mater Bioink: Scalable Expansion and Uniform Aggregation.
Interfaces, 6:1–10. Biofabrication, 10:44101.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40898-017-0003-8 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aacfc3
114. Zhou F, Hong Y, Liang R, et al., 2020, Rapid Printing of 124. Choe G, Oh S, Seok JM, et al., 2019, Graphene Oxide/
Bio-inspired 3D Tissue Constructs for Skin Regeneration. alginate Composites as Novel Bioinks for Three-dimensional
Biomaterials, 258:120287. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Printing and Bone Regeneration
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120287 Applications. Nanoscale, 11:23275–85.
115. Kim H, Park MN, Kim J, et al., 2019, Characterization of https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr07643c
Cornea-specific Bioink: High Transparency, Improved In 125. Gonzalez-Fernandez T, Rathan S, Hobbs C, et al., 2019,
Vivo Safety. J Tissue Eng, 10:2041731418823382. Pore-forming bioinks to Enable Spatio-temporally Defined
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731418823382 Gene Delivery in Bioprinted Tissues. J Control Release,
116. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, et al., 2016, Effect of Bioink 301:13–27.
Properties on Printability and Cell Viability for 3D Bioplotting https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.006
of Embryonic Stem Cells. Biofabrication, 8:1–12. 126. Sodupe-Ortega E, Sanz-Garcia A, Pernia-Espinoza A, et al.,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 2018, Accurate Calibration in Multi-material 3D Bioprinting
117. Campos DFD, Blaeser A, Korsten A, et al., 2015, The Stiffness for Tissue Engineering. Materials (Basel), 11:1–19.
and Structure of Three-dimensional Printed Hydrogels Direct https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081402
the Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells toward 127. Liu J, Li L, Suo H, et al., 2019, 3D Printing of Biomimetic
Adipogenic and Osteogenic Lineages. Tissue Eng Part A, Multi-layered GelMA/nHA Scaffold for Osteochondral
21:740–56. Defect Repair. Mater Des, 171:107708.
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0231 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107708
118. Ma H, Zhou Q, Chang J, et al., 2019, Grape Seed-Inspired 128. Admane P, Gupta AC, Jois P, et al., 2019, Direct 3D
Smart Hydrogel Scaffolds for Melanoma Therapy and Wound Bioprinted Full-thickness Skin Constructs Recapitulate
Healing. ACS Nano, 13:4302–11. Regulatory Signaling Pathways and Physiology of Human
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09496 Skin. Bioprinting, 15:e00051.
119. Park J, Lee SJ, Chung S, et al., 2017, Cell-laden 3D bioprinting https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00051
hydrogel matrix depending on different compositions for soft 129. Kwak H, Shin S, Lee H, et al., 2019, Formation of a Keratin
tissue engineering: Characterization and evaluation. Mater Layer with Silk Fibroin-polyethylene Glycol Composite
Sci Eng C, 71:678–84. Hydrogel Fabricated by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.069 J Ind Eng Chem, 72:232–40.
120. Zhu W, Cui H, Boualam B, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.12.023
Mesenchymal Stem Cell-laden Construct with Core- 130. Pereira RF, Sousa A, Barrias CC, et al., 2018, A Single-
shell Nanospheres for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. component Hydrogel Bioink for Bioprinting of Bioengineered

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2 85